The evolution of helping and harming on graphs: the return of the inclusive fitness effect

Evolutionary graph theory has been proposed as providing new fundamental rules for the evolution of co‐operation and altruism. But how do these results relate to those of inclusive fitness theory? Here, we carry out a retrospective analysis of the models for the evolution of helping on graphs of Ohtsuki et al. [Nature (2006) 441, 502] and Ohtsuki & Nowak [Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci (2006) 273, 2249]. We show that it is possible to translate evolutionary graph theory models into classical kin selection models without disturbing at all the mathematics describing the net effect of selection on helping. Model analysis further demonstrates that costly helping evolves on graphs through limited dispersal and overlapping generations. These two factors are well known to promote relatedness between interacting individuals in spatially structured populations. By allowing more than one individual to live at each node of the graph and by allowing interactions to vary with the distance between nodes, our inclusive fitness model allows us to consider a wider range of biological scenarios leading to the evolution of both helping and harming behaviours on graphs.

[1]  L. Keller,et al.  The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[2]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  THE ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS OF ALTRUISM IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS POPULATIONS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Kenichi Aoki,et al.  A CONDITION FOR GROUP SELECTION TO PREVAIL OVER COUNTERACTING INDIVIDUAL SELECTION , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model , 1970, Nature.

[6]  I. Eshel.  On the neighbor effect and the evolution of altruistic traits. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  F. Rousset.  Separation of time scales, fixation probabilities and convergence to evolutionarily stable states under isolation by distance. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  A Grafen,et al.  An inclusive fitness analysis of altruism on a cyclical network , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[10]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[11]  L. Keller,et al.  Sex Ratio Conflict and Worker Production in Eusocial Hymenoptera , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Christoph Hauert,et al.  Effects of Space in 2 × 2 Games , 2002, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[13]  M N,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population , 1996 .

[14]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[15]  F. Rousset,et al.  The Robustness of Hamilton’s Rule with Inbreeding and Dominance: Kin Selection and Fixation Probabilities under Partial Sib Mating , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Rousset,et al.  A theoretical basis for measures of kin selection in subdivided populations: finite populations and localized dispersal , 2000 .

[17]  T Nagylaki.  The decay of genetic variability in geographically structured populations. II. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Effective number of alleles in a subdivided population. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  F. Rousset,et al.  POPULATION DEMOGRAPHY AND THE EVOLUTION OF HELPING BEHAVIORS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  P D Taylor,et al.  OVERLAPPING GENERATIONS CAN PROMOTE ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Decay of genetic variability in geographically structured populations. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[23]  P. Taylor.  Altruism in viscous populations — an inclusive fitness model , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  M. Baalen,et al.  The Unit of Selection in Viscous Populations and the Evolution of Altruism. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  T. Nagylaki.  Geographical invariance in population genetics. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  J. Koella,et al.  The spatial spread of altruism versus the evolutionary response of egoists , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  M. Nowak.  Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[28]  F. Rousset.  Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations (MPB-40) , 2004 .

[29]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Sabin Lessard,et al.  Long-term stability from fixation probabilities in finite populations: new perspectives for ESS theory. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  François Rousset,et al.  A minimal derivation of convergence stability measures. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  L. Lehmann,et al.  The evolution of trans‐generational altruism: kin selection meets niche construction , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[33]  T. Nagylaki.  The robustness of neutral models of geographical variation , 1983 .

[34]  D. Queller,et al.  Does population viscosity promote kin selection? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  M A Nowak,et al.  Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  P D Taylor,et al.  Evolution of altruism in stepping-stone populations with overlapping generations. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  G Malécot,et al.  Heterozygosity and relationship in regularly subdivided populations. , 1975, Theoretical population biology.

[38]  Alan Grafen,et al.  Optimization of inclusive fitness. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[40]  F. Ratnieks.  The evolution of cooperation and altruism: the basic conditions are simple and well known , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[41]  P. T,et al.  How to Make a Kin Selection Model , 1996 .

[42]  B. Epperson.  Gene genealogies in geographically structured populations. , 1999, Genetics.

[43]  S. Siller.  Foundations of Social Evolution , 1999, Heredity.

[44]  F. Rousset,et al.  Evolution of stepping-stone dispersal rates , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  T. Maruyama,et al.  A simple proof that certain quantities are independent of the geographical structure of population. , 1974, Theoretical population biology.

[46]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games on cycles , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.