Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry

[1]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[2]  C. Woernle,et al.  Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Decompression Surgery for Spinal Canal Stenosis in the Aged Population: A Prospective Swiss Multicenter Cohort Study , 2015, Spine.

[3]  C. Röder,et al.  Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[4]  K. Michaëlsson,et al.  Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  C. A. Jones,et al.  Health-related quality of life and comorbidities associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  P. Eysel,et al.  Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[7]  M. Grotle,et al.  Prognosis of Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Across Gender and Age Groups , 2011, The open orthopaedics journal.

[8]  R. Deyo,et al.  Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Zubair A Wali,et al.  Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  S. Lydersen,et al.  Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study , 2010, BMC surgery.

[11]  C. Stüer,et al.  Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic®-system: a prospective observation , 2010, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[12]  C. Röder,et al.  SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[13]  S. Schaeren,et al.  Minimum Four-Year Follow-up of Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Treated With Decompression and Dynamic Stabilization , 2008, Spine.

[14]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Shabat,et al.  Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[16]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[17]  J. P. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Declaración de la Iniciativa STOBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology): directrices para informar sobre los estudios observacionales , 2007 .

[18]  S. Savolainen,et al.  Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[19]  K. Saban,et al.  Patient Expectations of Quality of Life Following Lumbar Spinal Surgery , 2007, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[20]  David S. Rosen,et al.  MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL DECOMPRESSION IN THE ELDERLY: OUTCOMES OF 50 PATIENTS AGED 75 YEARS AND OLDER , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[21]  Markku Heliövaara,et al.  Surgical or Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Spine.

[22]  S. Savolainen,et al.  Preoperative Predictors for Postoperative Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review , 2006, Spine.

[23]  James D. Kang,et al.  Prevalence of Symptoms of Cervical and Lumbar Stenosis Among Participants in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study , 2006, Spine.

[24]  J. Wöhrle,et al.  Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[25]  N. Semmer,et al.  Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[26]  Carsten Perka,et al.  The Surgical Treatment of the Lumbar Disc Prolapse: Nucleotomy With Additional Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization Versus Nucleotomy Alone , 2005, Spine.

[27]  Astrid Junge,et al.  Clinical Experience With the Dynesys Semirigid Fixation System for the Lumbar Spine: Surgical and Patient-Oriented Outcome in 50 Cases After an Average of 2 Years , 2005, Spine.

[28]  A. Obwegeser,et al.  Long-Term Outcome of Laminectomy for Spinal Stenosis in Octogenarians , 2005, Spine.

[29]  A. Adunsky,et al.  Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[30]  M. Richter,et al.  Dorsale dynamische Stabilisierung als Alternative zur dorso-ventralen Fusion bei Spinalkanalstenose mit degenerativer Instabilität , 2003 .

[31]  O. Schwarzenbach,et al.  The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[32]  S R Garfin,et al.  Predicting Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  B. Rydevik,et al.  A long-term (4- to 12-year) follow-up study of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[34]  M. Abdelnoor,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. , 2000, Spine.

[35]  E. Hadar,et al.  Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[36]  J. Katz,et al.  The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[37]  R. Porter,et al.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. , 1996, Spine.

[38]  M. Nordin,et al.  Health Care Utilization for Low Back Pain in Belgium: Influence of Sociocultural Factors and Health Beliefs , 1995, Spine.

[39]  P. Wood,et al.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[40]  M. Aebi,et al.  The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[41]  C. Ohaegbulam.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression in the Elderly: Outcomes of 50 Patients Aged 75 Years and Older , 2008 .

[42]  M. Richter,et al.  [Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability]. , 2003, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.