The future of academic publishing: what is open access?

For more than 200 years, publishers have been charging users (i.e., subscribers) for access to scientific information to make a profit. Authors have been required to grant copyright ownership to the publisher. This system was not questioned until the Internet popularized electronic publishing. The Internet allows for rapid dissemination of information to millions of readers. Some people have seen this as an opportunity to revolutionize the system of scientific publishing and to make it one that provides free, open access to all scientific information to all persons everywhere in the world. Such systems have been launched and have instigated a wave of dialogue among proponents and opponents alike. At the center of the controversy is the issue of who will pay for the costs of publishing, because an open-access system is not free, and this threatens the backbone of the traditional publishing industry. Currently, open-access publishers charge authors a fee to have their articles published. Because of this and the uncertainty of the sustainability of the open-access system, some authors are hesitant to participate in the new system. This article reviews the events that led to the creation of open-access publishing, the arguments for and against it, and the implications of open access for the future of academic publishing.

[1]  Introduction of article-processing charges for Population Health Metrics , 2003, Population health metrics.

[2]  Tony Delamothe,et al.  Open access publishing takes off , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  D A B Lindberg,et al.  Medicine in the 21st Century: Global Problems, Global Solutions , 2002, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[4]  Brian D Crawford,et al.  Open-access publishing: where is the value? , 2003, The Lancet.

[5]  Marek R Graczyński,et al.  Open access publishing -- panacea or Trojan horse? , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[6]  Sandra G. Franklin,et al.  Open Access Publishing , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[7]  Faith McLellan,et al.  US bill says government funded work must be open access , 2003, The Lancet.

[8]  P. S. Tamber,et al.  Open access to peer-reviewed research: making it happen , 2003, The Lancet.

[9]  Nicholas R Cozzarelli,et al.  Results of a PNAS author survey on an open access option for publication. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  David Malakoff Opening the Books on Open Access , 2003, Science.

[11]  John Ewing,et al.  'Open access' will not be open to everyone , 2003, Nature.

[12]  N. I. Thomas Issues in Electronic Research Publishing: Implications for Occupational Health Care , 2003, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[13]  J Willinsky,et al.  The nine flavours of open access scholarly publishing. , 2003, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[14]  S. Lawrence Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact , 2001, Nature.