Welfare Implications of Community Forest Plantations in Developing Countries: The Orissa Social Forestry Project

Community forest plantations are a common intervention in developing countries. We use household and remote sensing data from Orissa, India, to estimate welfare effects of community forest plantations, in terms of the value of decreased collection times plantations afford users. A selection model, accounting for possible jointness in site location and productivity, is used to estimate collection production functions for different household labor categories in natural and community forests. Two measures of an opportunity cost of time are used to determine welfare effects of time saved due to community forests. We find access to community forests is important to marginal productivity of different labor categories, but to different degrees, highlighting the need to disaggregate household data when analyzing these interventions. We also find substantial welfare improvements from time savings for many households and villages.

[1]  E. Skoufias.  Using Shadow Wages to Estimate Labor Supply of Agricultural Households , 1994 .

[2]  G. Köhlin,et al.  Impact of Plantations on Forest Use and Forest Status in Orissa, India , 2001, Ambio.

[3]  Robert D. Willig,et al.  Consumer's Surplus Without Apology , 1976 .

[4]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .

[5]  Gunnar Köhlin,et al.  Fuelwood revisited: what has changed in the last decade? , 2003 .

[6]  A. Mekonnen.  Rural household biomass fuel production and consumption in Ethiopia: a case study. , 1999 .

[7]  G. Amacher,et al.  Economics of forestry and rural development: an empirical introduction from Asia. , 2000 .

[8]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Calculating the Value of Time Spent Collecting Water: Some Estimates for Ukunda, Kenya , 1990 .

[9]  Paul P. Biemer,et al.  Introduction to Survey Quality , 2003 .

[10]  Gunnar Köhlin,et al.  Woodfuels, livelihoods, and policy interventions: changing perspectives , 2006 .

[11]  E. Cecelski.  Energy and Rural Women's Work: Crisis Response and Policy Alternatives , 1987 .

[12]  David Hotchkiss,et al.  Consequences of Deforestation for Women's Time Allocation, Agricultural Production, and Nutrition in Hill Areas of Nepal , 1988 .

[13]  G. Köhlin.  Contingent valuation in project planning and evaluation: the case of social forestry in Orissa, India , 2001, Environment and Development Economics.

[14]  James A. Thornton.  Estimating the choice behavior of self-employed business proprietors: An application to dairy farmers , 1994 .

[15]  P. Cooke.  Intrahousehold Labor Allocation Responses to Environmental Good Scarcity: A Case Study from the Hills of Nepal , 1998, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[16]  G. Amacher,et al.  Household fuelwood demand and supply in Nepal's Tarai and Mid-Hills: Choice between cash outlays and labor opportunity , 1996 .

[17]  G. Köhlin,et al.  Spatial Variability and Disincentives to Harvest: Deforestation and Fuelwood Collection in South Asia , 2001, Land Economics.

[18]  T. Amemiya.  Tobit models: A survey , 1984 .

[19]  Hanan G. Jacoby.  Shadow Wages and Peasant Family Labour Supply: An Econometric Application to the Peruvian Sierra , 1993 .

[20]  Gunnar Köhlin,et al.  Social Forestry Reconsidered , 2000 .

[21]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Fuelwood collection in north-eastern Zimbabwe: valuation and caloric expenditures. , 2001 .