Chapter 23 Measuring Rebelliousness: The Development of The Negativism Dominance Scale

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on measuring rebelliousness. It describes the development of the negativism dominance scale. Negativism and conformity are central concepts in reversal theory, which form one of a number of pairs of bistable metamotivational states, among which there are said to be switches or “reversals.” Reversal theory posits that for a given pair of states, such as the negativistic and the conformist states, there is an internal bias, such that more time is likely to be spent in one state than in the other; and within the theory the degree of this bias is known as “dominance.” The negativistic dominant individual can be described synonymously as “rebellious” or “oppositional” and the negativistic state can be described as the “rebellious” or “oppositional” state. The concept of dominance is said to differ from that of “trait” because the former does not assume that behavior is consistent across situations. The development of a psychometrically sound measure of rebelliousness is based on the assumption that the construct merits investigation. The construct can be seen to be particularly relevant to the psychology of adolescence, for it is during this developmental period that rebelliousness is purported to be most prevalent.

[1]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  H. Triandis,et al.  Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation , 1985 .

[3]  S. Asch Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[4]  A. Buss,et al.  An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. , 1957, Journal of consulting psychology.

[5]  S. Cobb Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. , 1976, Psychosomatic medicine.

[6]  D. Goldberg,et al.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire , 1979, Psychological Medicine.

[7]  S. Nowicki,et al.  A locus of control scale for children. , 1973 .

[8]  M. Apter,et al.  The development of the Telic Dominance Scale. , 1978, Journal of personality assessment.

[9]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[10]  D. Galloway Persistent Absence from School , 1982 .

[11]  L. Tucker A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[12]  T. L. Kelley The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. , 1939 .

[13]  S. Milgram BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  J. W. Riemer Deviance as fun. , 1981, Adolescence.

[15]  G. Berenson,et al.  Factor Analytic Study of the Children's Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale' , 1982 .

[16]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  An analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale. , 1980 .

[17]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[18]  C Wenar,et al.  On negativism. , 1982, Human development.

[19]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[20]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  J. Balswick,et al.  Parental Stimulus for Adolescent Rebellion. , 1975 .