Open vs.Closed standards for ambient intelligence: an exploratory study of adoption

Emerging forms of structurally complex information systems, such as Ambient Intelligence (AmI), requires the integration of a range of technologies. To enable such systems’ development there is a reliance on interoperability standards. However, due to their inherent characteristics, the adoption of open or closed standards by technology vendors can have impacts the later stages of the adoption and diffusion of systems. This paper reports on research-in-progress which explores the adoption of open and closed standards by technology vendors engaged in AmI development. Existing models of innovation adoption and diffusion fail to adequately account for adoption in more complex technological contexts. In order to address such deficiencies, current perspectives on standards are discussed, before a conceptual framework for structuring the research is proposed which integrates both existing adoption theory and standards-oriented research. The use of the European Consumer Electronics sector as a unit of analysis is discussed, before concluding with an overview of how the study will progress.

[1]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  Jeffrey L. Funk,et al.  Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication , 2001 .

[3]  G. Tassey Standardization in technology-based markets , 2000 .

[4]  Kai Jacobs,et al.  Standardisation and Innovation in Information Technology: SIIT'99 proceedings : 1st ieee conference on standardisation and innovation in information technology, Aachen, September 15-17, 1999 , 1999 .

[5]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[6]  Abdelsalam Helal Programming pervasive spaces , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[7]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Human Experience , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[8]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[9]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Innovation and Control in Standards Architectures: The Rise and Fall of Japan's PC-98 , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[11]  Diomidis Spinellis,et al.  Intelligent Cokes and Diapers: MyGROCER Ubiquitous Computing Environment , 2002 .

[12]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[13]  Jadwiga Indulska,et al.  Infrastructure for Pervasive Computing: Challenges , 2001, GI Jahrestagung.

[14]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  Beyond Prototypes: Challenges in Deploying Ubiquitous Systems , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[15]  H. Landis Gabel,et al.  Competitive strategies for product standards : the strategic use of compatibility standards for competitive advantage , 1991 .

[16]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[17]  J. West,et al.  What are Open Standards? Implications for Adoption, Competition and Policy , 2004 .

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[19]  Eric J. Iversen,et al.  Raising standards: innovation and the emerging global standardization environment for ICTs , 2001, Proceedings from the 2nd IEEE Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (Cat. No.01EX530).

[20]  J. Rice Collaboration and competition in emerging standards: an assessment of the implications for knowledge management , 2001, Proceedings from the 2nd IEEE Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (Cat. No.01EX530).

[21]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing: A Research Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[22]  K. Ducatel,et al.  Scenarios for Ambient Intelligence in 2010 Final Report , 2001 .

[23]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence , 2003 .

[24]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[25]  Seppo Sirkemaa,et al.  IT infrastructure management and standards , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing.

[26]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Redefining Firm Boundaries in the Face of the Internet: Are Firms Really Shrinking? , 2003 .

[27]  Boriana Rukanova,et al.  Identification of different types of standards for domain-specific interoperability , 2003 .

[28]  Jan Karlsbjerg Staying outside the mainstream: An empirical study of standards choices , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  David Garlan,et al.  Project Aura: Toward Distraction-Free Pervasive Computing , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[30]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[31]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[32]  Rajiv P. Mehta,et al.  Applications thrive on open systems standards , 1994, STAN.

[33]  Ken Krechmer The Meaning of Open Standards , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Alain Karsenty,et al.  Unremarkable computing , 2002, CHI.

[35]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Proprietary versus internet technologies and the adoption and impact of electronic marketplaces , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  The Shaping of Inter-Organisational Information Systems: Main Design Considerations of an International Comparative Research Project , 2004, Bled eConference.

[37]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing , 2000, TCHI.

[38]  Patrick Feng,et al.  Studying standardization: a review of the literature , 2003, ESSDERC 2003. Proceedings of the 33rd European Solid-State Device Research - ESSDERC '03 (IEEE Cat. No. 03EX704).

[39]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations , 2001 .

[40]  Nayeem Islam,et al.  Toward ubiquitous acceptance of ubiquitous computing , 2003, CACM.

[41]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[42]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Robin Williams ICT standards setting from an innovation studies perspective , 1999 .

[44]  Paul Douglas,et al.  International Conference on Information Technology : Coding and Computing , 2003 .

[45]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: the Procrustean bed of standards , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..