Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles

As workplace air measurements of manufactured nanoparticles are relatively expensive to conduct, models can be helpful for a first tier assessment of exposure. A conceptual model was developed to give a framework for such models. The basis for the model is an analysis of the fate and underlying mechanisms of nanoparticles emitted by a source during transport to a receptor. Four source domains are distinguished; that is, production, handling of bulk product, dispersion of ready-to-use nanoproducts, fracturing and abrasion of end products. These domains represent different generation mechanisms that determine particle emission characteristics; for example, emission rate, particle size distribution, and source location. During transport, homogeneous coagulation, scavenging, and surface deposition will determine the fate of the particles and cause changes in both particle size distributions and number concentrations. The degree of impact of these processes will be determined by a variety of factors including the concentration and size mode of the emitted nanoparticles and background aerosols, source to receptor distance, and ventilation characteristics. The second part of the paper focuses on to what extent the conceptual model could be fit into an existing mechanistic predictive model for ‘‘conventional’’ exposures. The model should be seen as a framework for characterization of exposure to (manufactured) nanoparticles and future exposure modeling.

[1]  J. Kong,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticle release during the synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Andrea R. Ferro,et al.  Resuspension of Dust Particles in a Chamber and Associated Environmental Factors , 2008 .

[3]  H Fissan,et al.  Particle Characteristics in the Reactor and Pelletizing Areas of Carbon Black Production , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[4]  A. Lai Particle deposition indoors: a review. , 2002, Indoor air.

[5]  Linsey C Marr,et al.  Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanomaterials. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Particle emission and exposure during nanoparticle synthesis in research laboratories. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  Keld Alstrup Jensen,et al.  Sanding dust from nanoparticle-containing paints: Physical characterisation , 2009 .

[8]  G. Kasper,et al.  Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. , 2010, Toxicology.

[10]  Keld Alstrup Jensen,et al.  Relevance of aerosol dynamics and dustiness for personal exposure to manufactured nanoparticles , 2009 .

[11]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[12]  K. Jensen,et al.  Release of VOCs and particles during use of nanofilm spray products. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[14]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  B. van Ravenzwaay,et al.  Generation and Characterization of Test Atmospheres with Nanomaterials , 2007, Inhalation toxicology.

[16]  R. Khettabi,et al.  Fine and Ultrafine Particle Characterization and Modeling in High-Speed Milling of 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy , 2009, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[17]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Modeling particle deposition and distribution in a chamber with a two-equation Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model , 2006 .

[18]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Ultrafine Particles Deposition Inside Passenger Vehicles , 2009 .

[19]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  Elastic Flattening and Particle Adhesion , 1991 .

[20]  K. T. Whitby Determination of aerosol growth rates in the atmosphere using lumped mode aerosol dynamics , 1981 .

[21]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: defining modifying factors. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[22]  Kyunghee Choi,et al.  Characterization of exposure to silver nanoparticles in a manufacturing facility , 2009 .

[23]  O. Raabe The dilution of monodisperse suspensions for aerosolization. , 1968, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[24]  Lang Tran,et al.  Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regulation , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[26]  T A J Kuhlbusch,et al.  Number Size Distribution, Mass Concentration, and Particle Composition of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in Bag Filling Areas of Carbon Black Production , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[27]  P. Swuste,et al.  Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures , 2009 .

[28]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[29]  Kikuo Okuyama,et al.  RE-ENTRAINMENT OF SMALL AGGREGATE PARTICLES FROM A PLANE SURFACE BY AIR STREAM , 1980 .

[30]  Andrew Maynard,et al.  Recirculating Air Filtration Significantly Reduces Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[31]  W. Fransman,et al.  Development and evaluation of an exposure control efficacy library (ECEL). , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[32]  A. Hart,et al.  Exposure to nanoscale particles and fibers during machining of hybrid advanced composites containing carbon nanotubes , 2009 .

[33]  J. Mead,et al.  Airborne Nanoparticle Release Associated with the Compounding of Nanocomposites Using Nanoalumina as Fillers , 2008 .

[34]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part A , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[35]  J. Isaacs,et al.  Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods , 2009 .

[36]  R. Aitken,et al.  Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements , 2007 .

[37]  Sherrie Elzey,et al.  Airborne Monitoring to Distinguish Engineered Nanomaterials from Incidental Particles for Environmental Health and Safety , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[38]  H. Ayer,et al.  Irritants in cigarette smoke plumes. , 1982, American journal of public health.

[39]  Mark M. Methner,et al.  Engineering Case Reports , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[40]  Daniel J. Rader,et al.  Aerosol Wall Losses in Electrically Charged Chambers , 1985 .

[41]  Michael Stintz,et al.  Method for the characterization of the abrasion induced nanoparticle release into air from surface coatings , 2009 .

[42]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: a review , 2009 .

[43]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[44]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Particle deposition rates in residential houses , 2005 .

[45]  Martin Scheringer,et al.  Size-fractionated characterization and quantification of nanoparticle release rates from a consumer spray product containing engineered nanoparticles , 2010 .

[46]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plant. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[47]  Kari E. J. Lehtinen,et al.  Multicomponent aerosol dynamics model UHMA: model development and validation , 2004 .

[48]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Evolution of nanoparticle size and mixing state near the point of emission , 2004 .

[49]  Delphine Bard,et al.  From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects , 2009 .

[50]  A. Lai,et al.  An Eulerian model for particle deposition under electrostatic and turbulent conditions , 2004 .

[51]  Takahiro Kobayashi,et al.  Measurement of the Physical Properties of Aerosols in a Fullerene Factory for Inhalation Exposure Assessment , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[52]  F. Tardif,et al.  Experimental evaluation of personal protection devices against graphite nanoaerosols: fibrous filter media, masks, protective clothing, and gloves , 2009, Human & experimental toxicology.

[53]  P. Baron,et al.  Exposure to Carbon Nanotube Material: Aerosol Release During the Handling of Unrefined Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.