Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong “bottom-up” cues for phonemic restoration

[1]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Auditory induction: Reciprocal changes in alternating sounds , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  L. Braida,et al.  Band‐envelope speechreading supplements derived from noisy speech , 1994 .

[3]  C Speaks,et al.  Intelligibility of selected passages from the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  L D Braida,et al.  Auditory supplements to speechreading: combining amplitude envelope cues from different spectral regions of speech. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. Rosen.  Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga,et al.  Lexical Mediation between Sight and Sound in Speechreading , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Effects of glide slope, noise intensity, and noise duration on the extrapolation of FM glides through noise , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Samuel.  A Further Examination of Attentional Effects in the Phonemic Restoration Illusion , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  L D Braida,et al.  Single Band Amplitude Envelope Cues as an Aid to Speechreading , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P E Rubin,et al.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: Contributions of amplitude variation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  A. Samuel,et al.  The role of knowledge-based expectations in music perception: evidence from musical restoration. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  J A Bashford,et al.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations. , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. D. Trout,et al.  Auditory and Visual Influences on Phonemic Restoration , 1990, Language and speech.

[15]  B. Repp,et al.  Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print , 1988 .

[16]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Illusory continuity of interrupted speech: speech rate determines durational limits. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Walley.  Spoken word recognition by young children and adults , 1988 .

[18]  P C Gordon,et al.  Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J A Bashford,et al.  Effects of spectral alternation on the intelligibility of words and sentences , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  A S Bregman,et al.  Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  A. Samuel.  Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration , 1987 .

[24]  R Plomp,et al.  Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A. Samuel,et al.  Attention within auditory word perception: insights from the phonemic restoration illusion. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  S. Soli,et al.  Time‐intensity envelope cues for consonant recognition , 1985 .

[27]  A. Salasoo,et al.  Interaction of Knowledge Sources in Spoken Word Identification. , 1985, Journal of memory and language.

[28]  P K Kuhl,et al.  The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R Plomp,et al.  Speechreading supplemented with frequency-selective sound-pressure information. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R M Warren,et al.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  J Verschuure,et al.  Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  A. Samuel.  The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Takayuki Sasaki,et al.  Sound Restoration and Temporal Localization of Noise in Speech and Music Sounds , 1981 .

[34]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Speech perception by profoundly hearing-impaired children. , 1979, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[35]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Perceptual synthesis of deleted phonemes , 1979 .

[36]  H. Verschuure.  Auditory excitation patterns : the significance of the pulsation threshold method for the measurement of auditory nonlinearity , 1978 .

[37]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  G L Dannenbring,et al.  Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. , 1976, Canadian journal of psychology.

[39]  B. Layton.  Differential effects of two nonspeech sounds on phonemic restoration , 1975 .

[40]  J. M. Ackroff,et al.  Auditory Induction: Perceptual Synthesis of Absent Sounds , 1972, Science.

[41]  T. Houtgast.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Speech-envelope cues as an acoustic aid to lipreading for profoundly deaf children. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  A. House,et al.  A masking noise with speech-envelope characteristics for studying intelligibility. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Speech perception and phonemic restorations , 1971 .

[45]  C. M. Holloway,et al.  Passing the Strongly Voiced Components of Noisy Speech , 1970, Nature.

[46]  D. Dirks,et al.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  R. M. Warren.  Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[48]  M. Schroeder.  Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[49]  COLIN CHERRY,et al.  Speech Communication in Very Noisy Environments , 1967, Nature.

[50]  W. Thurlow,et al.  An auditory figure-ground effect. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[51]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  CX Problems Related to the Use of Speech in Clinical Audiometry , 1955, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[52]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .

[53]  B H Repp,et al.  Perceptual restoration of a “missing” speech sound: Auditory induction or illusion? , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  P J Blamey,et al.  A comparison of three speech coding strategies using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  A. Samuel.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context , 1974 .

[57]  G. L. Powers,et al.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.