Fault Exclusion in Multi-Constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems

This paper comprehensively investigates the fault exclusion problem in multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). In future GNSS, the heightened likelihood of fault detection events will cause more interruptions in the continuity of the navigation operation. The main contribution of this paper is to establish the theoretical basis to quantify the contributions of fault events on continuity risk, therefore allowing us to assess the desired exclusion function performance based on specific continuity requirements. Accordingly, a new real-time exclusion algorithm is developed, for which the upper bounds on integrity risks are rigorously derived. Using the new method, performance is comprehensively investigated for two important civil aircraft navigation operations using various numbers of constellations. We show that high service availability can be achieved for both operations.

[1]  Liang Heng,et al.  Automated verification of potential GPS signal-in-space anomalies using ground observation data , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[2]  Young C. Lee Analysis of Range and Position Comparison Methods as a Means to Provide GPS Integrity in the User Receiver , 1986 .

[3]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  Integrity Risk and Continuity Risk for Fault Detection and Exclusion Using Solution Separation ARAIM , 2013 .

[4]  Juan Blanch,et al.  Baseline advanced RAIM user algorithm and possible improvements , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Autonomous GPS Integrity Monitoring Using the Pseudorange Residual , 1988 .

[6]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  Bounding Continuity Risk in H-ARAIM FDE , 2017 .

[7]  Christophe Macabiau,et al.  Methods of Integrity Risk Computation for ARAIM FDE , 2017 .

[8]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  Fault detection and exclusion using solution separation and chi-squared ARAIM , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  J Blanch,et al.  RAIM with Optimal Integrity and Continuity Allocations Under Multiple Failures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Juan Blanch,et al.  Determination of fault probabilities for ARAIM , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS).

[11]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  Solution Separation Versus Residual-Based RAIM , 2014 .

[12]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  H-ARAIM Exclusion: Requirements and Performance , 2016 .

[13]  Per Enge,et al.  A Simple Satellite Exclusion Algorithm for Advanced RAIM , 2016 .

[14]  Brian Bian,et al.  Advanced RAIM Performance Sensitivity to Deviation of ISM Parameter Values , 2017 .

[15]  Young C. Lee,et al.  Feasibility Analysis of RAIM to Provide LPV-200 Approaches with Future GPS , 2007 .

[16]  Mathieu Joerger,et al.  Continuity and availability in Dual-Frequency Multi-Constellation ARAIM , 2015 .