The importance of polysomnography in the evaluation of prolonged disorders of consciousness: sleep recordings more adequately correlate than stimulus-related evoked potentials with patients' clinical status.

OBJECTIVES The aim of our study was to evaluate the importance of sleep recordings and stimulus-related evoked potentials (EPs) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOCs) by correlating neurophysiologic variables with clinical evaluation obtained using specific standardized scales. METHODS There were 27 vegetative state (VS) and 5 minimally conscious state (MCS) patients who were evaluated from a clinical and neurophysiologic perspective. Clinical evaluation included the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Neurophysiologic evaluation included 24-h polysomnography (PSG), somatosensory EPs (SEPs), brainstem auditory EPs (BAEPs), and visual EPs (VEPs). RESULTS Patients with preservation of each single sleep element (sleep-wake cycle, sleep spindles, K-complexes, and rapid eye movement [REM] sleep) always showed better clinical scores compared to those who did not have preservation. Statistical significance was only achieved for REM sleep. In 7 patients PSG showed the presence of all considered sleep elements, and they had a CRS-R score of 8.29±1.38. In contrast, 25 patients who lacked one or more of the sleep elements had a CRS-R score of 4.84±1.46 (P<.05). Our multivariate analysis clarified that concurrent presence of sleep spindles and REM sleep were associated with a much higher CRS-R score (positive interaction, P<.0001). On the other hand, no significant associations were found between EPs and CRS-R scores. CONCLUSIONS PSG recordings have proved to be a reliable tool in the neurophysiologic assessment of patients with prolonged DOCs, correlating more adequately than EPs with the clinical evaluation and the level of consciousness. The main contribution to higher clinical scores was determined by the concomitant presence of REM sleep and sleep spindles. PSG recordings may be considered inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy-to-perform examinations to provide supplementary information in patients with prolonged DOCs.

[1]  Hidenori Kobayashi,et al.  Sleep cycle in patients in a state of permanent unconsciousness , 2002, Brain injury.

[2]  K. Andrews,et al.  Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit , 1996, BMJ.

[3]  H. Bhathal,et al.  [Mismatch negativity and conscience level in severe traumatic brain injury]. , 2007, Revista de neurologia.

[4]  D Morlet,et al.  Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Gigli,et al.  Sleep organization pattern as a prognostic marker at the subacute stage of post-traumatic coma , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Evans,et al.  Prediction of outcome in severe head injury based on recognition of sleep related activity in the polygraphic electroencephalogram. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  F Mauguière,et al.  Astereognosis and dissociated loss of frontal or parietal components of somatosensory evoked potentials in hemispheric lesions. Detailed correlations with clinical signs and computerized tomographic scanning. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  M. Boly,et al.  Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Boly,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment , 2009, BMC neurology.

[10]  T Sarraf,et al.  Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states , 2010, Neurology.

[11]  Multi-Society Task Force on Pvs.  Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (2). , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Chesson,et al.  The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications , 2007 .

[13]  T. Rothstein.  The Utility of Median Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Anoxic-Ischemic Coma , 2009, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[14]  Steven Laureys,et al.  A twitch of consciousness: defining the boundaries of vegetative and minimally conscious states , 2008, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[15]  H. Gill-Thwaites.  Lotteries, loopholes and luck: Misdiagnosis in the vegetative state patient , 2006, Brain injury.

[16]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  B. Bergamasco,et al.  EEG sleep patterns as a prognostic criterion in post-traumatic coma. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  S Laureys,et al.  Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness , 2008, Neurology.

[19]  C. Fischer,et al.  Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  P. Bramanti,et al.  Sleep spindles in the initial stages of the vegetative state , 1994, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[21]  F. Giubilei,et al.  Sleep abnormalities in traumatic apallic syndrome. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[23]  David Bates,et al.  The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. , 2003, Clinical medicine.

[24]  M. Boly,et al.  Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Dominique Morlet,et al.  Predictive value of sensory and cognitive evoked potentials for awakening from coma , 2004, Neurology.

[26]  G. Tononi,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  J. Giacino,et al.  The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria , 2002, Neurology.

[28]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: Vegetative state and minimally conscious state , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Vegetative versus Minimally Conscious States: A Study Using TMS-EEG, Sensory and Event-Related Potentials , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  N. Childs,et al.  Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state , 1993, Neurology.

[31]  C. Fischer,et al.  Evoked potentials for the prediction of vegetative state in the acute stage of coma , 2005, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.

[32]  B. Kotchoubey,et al.  Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: A meta-analysis , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[34]  A. Ragazzoni,et al.  Prediction of ‘awakening’ and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  N. Childs,et al.  Brief report: late improvement in consciousness after post-traumatic vegetative state. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  J. Hulihan,et al.  Electroencephalographic sleep patterns in post‐anoxic stupor and coma , 1994, Neurology.