Unique and Interactive Effects of Empathy and Social Status on Involvement in Bullying

This study investigated the relationships between affective and cognitive empathy, social preference and perceived popularity, and involvement in bullying situations by bullying others or defending the victimized children. The participants were 266 primary and 195 secondary school students. Affective and cognitive empathy, as well as the status variables, had some significant main effects on involvement in bullying. In addition, several interaction effects emerged. For instance, the positive association between affective empathy and defending behavior was stronger among boys who had a high status (i.e., were highly preferred) in the group. The results highlight the importance of studying child-by-environment models, which take into account both child characteristics and interpersonal variables in predicting social adjustment.

[1]  P. Hawley.  Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: an evolutionary perspective. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. , 2004, Child development.

[3]  David Warden,et al.  Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies , 2003 .

[4]  Gary W. Ladd,et al.  Children’s Peer Relations and Social Competence: A Century of Progress , 2005 .

[5]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[6]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy. , 1987 .

[7]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Altruism and Prosocial Behavior , 2003 .

[8]  J. Strayer,et al.  Empathy in Conduct-Disordered and Comparison Youth. , 1996 .

[9]  K. Scherer,et al.  Handbook of affective sciences. , 2003 .

[10]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[11]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Empathy and its development , 1987 .

[13]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  From Peer Putdowns to Peer Support: A Th eoretical Model and How It Translated into a National Anti-Bullying Program , 2009 .

[14]  D. Olweus.  Bullying at School , 1994 .

[15]  K Rigby,et al.  Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. , 1991, The Journal of social psychology.

[16]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression , 1999 .

[17]  J. Strayer,et al.  Affective and cognitive perspectives on empathy. , 1987 .

[18]  C. Edwards,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Sex Differences in the Behavior of Children Aged Three Through 11 , 1973 .

[19]  D. Olweus,et al.  Bullying at school : what we know and what we can do / Dan Olweus , 1993 .

[20]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[21]  W. Gardner,et al.  Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression , 1994 .

[22]  Marc H. Bornstein,et al.  Well-Being: Positive Development across the Life Course. , 2003 .

[23]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[24]  Gianmarco Altoè,et al.  Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior? , 2007, Aggressive behavior.

[25]  M. Prinstein,et al.  Forms and Functions of Adolescent Peer Aggression Associated With High Levels of Peer Status , 2003 .

[26]  Todd D. Little,et al.  Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour , 2003 .

[27]  N. Eisenberg.  Prosocial behavior, empathy, and sympathy. , 2003 .

[28]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[29]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression , 1992 .

[30]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Victims of Peer Aggression. , 1988 .

[31]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  The heritability of characteristics associated with dispositional empathy. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[32]  Marinus Voeten,et al.  Person–Group Dissimilarity in Involvement in Bullying and Its Relation with Social Status , 2007, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[33]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[34]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relations of children's emotion regulation to their vicarious emotional responses and comforting behaviors. , 1994, Child development.

[35]  A. Cillessen,et al.  Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. , 2006, Journal of adolescence.

[36]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Sociometric Status and Adjustment in Middle School: A Longitudinal Study , 2003 .

[37]  J. Strayer,et al.  Children’s Personal Distance and Their Empathy: Indices of Interpersonal Closeness , 1997 .

[38]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. , 1985 .

[39]  Robert Wuthnow,et al.  Learning to Care , 1996 .

[40]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  The Development of Prosocial Behavior , 1984 .

[41]  J. Sutton.  ToM goes to school: Social cognition and social values in bullying. , 2003 .

[42]  Helfried Moosbrugger,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method , 2000 .

[43]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[44]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[45]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal Sensitivity : Theory and Measurement , 2001 .

[46]  K. Dodge,et al.  Peer group behavior and social status. , 1990 .

[47]  K. Björkqvist,et al.  Social Intelligence and Empathy as Antecedents of Different Types of Aggression , 1996 .

[48]  Pete Smith,et al.  Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? , 1999 .

[49]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From indirect aggression to invisible aggression : A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation , 2006 .

[50]  M. Boulton,et al.  Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance , 1994 .

[51]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach , 1999 .

[52]  Ken Rigby,et al.  Expressed Readiness of Australian Schoolchildren to Act as Bystanders in Support of Children who are Being Bullied , 2006 .

[53]  Kate Musgrove,et al.  Dimensions of Social Status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance , 2002 .

[54]  D. Pepler,et al.  Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying , 2001 .

[55]  D. Espelage,et al.  Empathy, Caring, and Bullying: Toward an Understanding of Complex Associations , 2003 .

[56]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Emotions, cognition, and behavior , 1988 .

[57]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  The roots of prosocial behavior in children , 1989 .

[58]  Kathryn R Wentzel,et al.  Adolescent prosocial behavior: the role of self-processes and contextual cues. , 2007, Child development.

[59]  A. Cillessen,et al.  Understanding Popularity in the Peer System , 2005 .

[60]  D. Olweus,et al.  The Importance of Sex‐of‐Stimulus Object: Age Trends and Sex Differences in Empathic Responsiveness , 2001 .

[61]  K. Rudolph,et al.  A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  M. Hoffman.  11 – Development of Prosocial Motivation: Empathy and Guilt , 1982 .

[63]  O. Mayseless,et al.  Parenting Representations: Cambridge Studies in Social and Emotional Development , 2006 .

[64]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Children's peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations , 2004 .

[66]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Prosocial behavior and empathy: A multimethod developmental perspective , 1989 .

[67]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. , 1999, Journal of personality.

[68]  K. Björkqvist,et al.  Social intelligence - empathy = aggression? , 2000 .

[69]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Critical issues in the study of empathy. , 1987 .

[70]  D. Farrington,et al.  Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying , 2006 .

[71]  J. Strayer,et al.  Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior , 1996 .

[72]  B. Moore,et al.  Perspective-taking and altruism. , 1982 .

[73]  B. Repacholi,et al.  Individual differences in theory of mind : implications for typical and atypical development , 2003 .

[74]  Pete Smith,et al.  Bullying and ‘Theory of Mind’: A Critique of the ‘Social Skills Deficit’ View of Anti‐Social Behaviour , 2001 .