Wing Tip Drag Reduction at Nominal Take-Off Mach Number: An Approach to Local Active Flow Control with a Highly Robust Actuator System

This paper discusses wind tunnel test results aimed at advancing active flow control technology to increase the aerodynamic efficiency of an aircraft during take-off. A model of the outer section of a representative civil airliner wing was equipped with two-stage fluidic actuators between the slat edge and wing tip, where mechanical high-lift devices fail to integrate. The experiments were conducted at a nominal take-off Mach number of M = 0.2. At this incidence velocity, separation on the wing section, accompanied by increased drag, is triggered by the strong slat edge vortex at high angles of attack. On the basis of global force measurements and local static pressure data, the effect of pulsed blowing on the complex flow is evaluated, considering various momentum coefficients and spanwise distributions of the actuation effort. It is shown that through local intensification of forcing, a momentum coefficient of less than c μ = 0.6 % suffices to offset the stall by 2.4°, increase the maximum lift by more than 10% and reduce the drag by 37% compared to the uncontrolled flow.

[1]  G. Bergeles,et al.  Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design , 2012 .

[2]  Michael Meyer,et al.  Towards the Industrial Application of Active Flow Control in Civil Aircraft - An Active Highlift Flap , 2014 .

[3]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  High-Lift Performance Investigation of a Two-Element Configuration with a Two-Stage Actuator System , 2014 .

[4]  Abdollah Khodadoust,et al.  Active Control of Flow Separation on a High-Lift System with Slotted Flap at High Reynolds Number , 2007 .

[5]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  Experiments on Active Drag Reduction on a Complex Outer Wing Model , 2015 .

[6]  C Barus,et al.  THE FLYING MACHINE. , 1907, Science.

[7]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Active Flow Control for an Outer Wing Model of a Take-off Transport Aircraft Configuration - A Numerical Study , 2014 .

[8]  James W. Gregory,et al.  A Review of Fluidic Oscillator Development , 2013 .

[9]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Active Control of Flow Separation from Supercritical Airfoil Leading-Edge Flap Shoulder , 2005 .

[10]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Separation Control on a High-Lift Airfoil using Vortex Generator Jets at High Reynolds numbers , 2011 .

[11]  A. Seifert,et al.  Closed-Loop Active Flow Control Systems: Actuators , 2007 .

[12]  Thomas Corke,et al.  High Mach Number Leading-edge Flow Separation Control using AC DBD Plasma Actuators , 2011 .

[13]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Performance Enhancement of a Full-Scale Vertical Tail Model Equipped with Active Flow Control , 2015 .

[14]  Richard T. Whitcomb,et al.  A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets , 1976 .

[15]  Matthias Lengers.  INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT OF OVERALL AIRCRAFT DRIVEN LOCAL ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL , 2014 .

[16]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Flow Separation Control on A Full-Scale Vertical Tail Model Using Sweeping Jet Actuators , 2015 .

[17]  V. Brunet,et al.  Recent Onera Flow Control Research on High-Lift Configurations , 2013 .

[18]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Wind Tunnel Experiments with Active Flow Control for an Outer Wing Model , 2015 .

[19]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  Oscillatory Blowing: A Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation , 1993 .

[20]  B. F. Ewald,et al.  Wind Tunnel Wall Corrections (la Correction des effets de paroi en soufflerie) , 1998 .