Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks.

It has been suggested that the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp movement, performed within an action sequence, vary depending on the action goal and the properties of subsequent movement segments (action context effect). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the action context also affects action sequences that consist of several grasping movements directed toward different target objects. Twenty participants were asked to perform a sequence in which they grasped a cylinder, placed it into a target area, and subsequently grasped and displaced a target bar of a certain orientation. We specifically tested whether the orientation of the target bar being grasped in the last movement segment influenced the grip orientation adapted to grasp and place the cylinder in the preceding segments. When all movement segments within the sequence were easy to perform, results indeed showed that grip orientation chosen in the early movement segments depended on the forthcoming motor demands, suggesting a holistic planning process. In contrast, high accuracy demands in specifying a movement segment reduced the ability of the motor system to plan and organize the movement sequence into larger chunks, thus causing a shift toward sequential performance. Additionally, making the placing task more difficult resulted in prolonged reaction times and increased the movement times of all other movement segments.

[1]  Daniel Baldauf,et al.  The Posterior Parietal Cortex Encodes in Parallel Both Goals for Double-Reach Sequences , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Baraduc,et al.  Hand orientation for grasping depends on the direction of the reaching movement , 2000, Brain Research.

[3]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements , 2006, Vision Research.

[5]  A. Roby-Brami,et al.  Coupling between reaching movement direction and hand orientation for grasping , 2002, Brain Research.

[6]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Motor adaptation to an optical illusion , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Planning for action , 2020, Coaching with Research in Mind.

[8]  J. Koenderink The structure of images , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Eli Brenner,et al.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Regularization, Scale-Space, and Edge Detection Filters , 1996, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[11]  G. Savelsbergh,et al.  The role of fragility information in the guidance of the precision grip , 1996 .

[12]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection in sequential manual movements, movements around an obstacle and in grasping , 2005 .

[13]  M. E. McCarty,et al.  Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension , 2004 .

[14]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[15]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[16]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  H Mushiake,et al.  Pallidal neuron activity during sequential arm movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al.  Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  R. Cohen,et al.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  G. Stelmach Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[22]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  G P Bingham,et al.  Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  C L MacKenzie,et al.  Is object texture a constraint on human prehension?: kinematic evidence. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  D. Pélisson,et al.  From Eye to Hand: Planning Goal-directed Movements , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[27]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  P. Mamassian Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. Passingham Attention to action. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[31]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Effect of Orienting the Finger Opposition Space in the Control of Reach-to-Grasp Movements , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[33]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  Eli Brenner,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00162-X , 1998 .

[36]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Hand and brain : the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements , 1996 .

[37]  Ben Sidaway,et al.  Progamming time in serial tapping responses as a function of pathway constraint , 1990, Psychological research.

[38]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[40]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements , 2003 .

[41]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[42]  J Richardson,et al.  Spatial patterns in the control of human arm movement. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  J T Todd,et al.  Distortions of Three-Dimensional Space in the Perceptual Analysis of Motion and Stereo , 1995, Perception.

[44]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Scale-Space Filtering , 1983, IJCAI.

[45]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing , 1980 .

[46]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. 1954. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[48]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[49]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Breaking the flow of an action , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  P. Haggard Planning of action sequences , 1998 .

[51]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Segment interdependency and difficulty in two-stroke sequences , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  C. Armbrüster,et al.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement? , 2006, Motor control.

[53]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[55]  R. Andersen,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex. , 1989, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[56]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Response Functions Characterizing Brain Areas Using fMRI Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load , 2001, Neuron.

[59]  E. Johnston Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[60]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Planning movements well in advance , 2008, Cognitive Neuropsychology.

[62]  J. Culham,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  Luca Turella,et al.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[65]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Three Approaches to the Degrees of Freedom Problem in Reaching , 1996 .

[66]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[67]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional Selection of Multiple Goal Positions Before Rapid Hand Movement Sequences: An Event-related Potential Study , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  U. Castiello Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Alan Wing,et al.  Coordination of hand aperture with the spatial path of hand transport , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[71]  S. Jackson,et al.  Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[72]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[73]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .