Diffusion, Dissemination, and Implementation: Who Should Do What?

The concepts of diffusion, dissemination, and implementation are distinguished as progressively more active steps in the process of flowing valid and reliable research information into clinical practice. Using a staged model of behavior change, diffusion is seen as a precursor for dissemination activities, which in turn "predispose" physicians to consider change in their practices. Local implementation activities capitalize on this by "enabling" and subsequently "reinforcing" the desired behavior change. Different skills are needed for each activity. Biomedical journals, with some improvements, are identified as diffusion agents. Collaboration between academics and medical organizations is best suited to the dissemination stage. Local agents, empowered by resources, are best equipped for implementation activities.

[1]  R Hartley,et al.  Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. , 1982, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  J Lomas,et al.  Making Clinical Policy Explicit: Legislative Policy Making and Lessons for Developing Practice Guidelines , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[3]  B. Simmons,et al.  Continuous quality improvement. Concepts and applications for physician care. , 1991, JAMA.

[4]  A S Dixon,et al.  The Evolution of Clinical Policies , 1990, Medical care.

[5]  X Tonesk,et al.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. , 1992, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[6]  R B Haynes,et al.  Loose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  Eugene Vayda,et al.  Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. , 1991, JAMA.

[8]  M. Enkin,et al.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R H Brook,et al.  Persuasive communication and medical technology assessment. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  A L Greer,et al.  The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into Practice , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[11]  J W Williamson,et al.  Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.