Quantitative Measurement of Soil Erosion from Tls and Uav Data

Abstract. Soil erosion is a major issue concerning crop land degradation. Understanding these complex erosion processes is necessary for effective soil conservation. Herein, high resolution modelling of relief changes caused by run-off from precipitation events is an essential research matter. For non-invasive field measurements the combination of unmanned airborne vehicle (UAV) image data and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) may be especially suitable. The study's objective is to measure high precision digital terrain models (DTM) of the soil surface at two selected research areas with the extent of at least 500 square meters. The used UAV is integrated with GPS and inertial measurement unit (IMU). Furthermore, an active stabilizing camera mount equipped with a customary compact camera is implemented. For multi-temporal comparison of measured soil surfaces and for aligning UAV and TLS data a stable local reference system consisting of signalized points is defined by total station measurements. Two different software packages are applied for DTM generation from UAV images and compared to the corresponding DTM captured by TLS. Differences between the point clouds are minimal six millimeters and generally within TLS accuracy range. First multi-temporal comparisons are made and illustrate interesting surface changes.

[1]  J. Poesen,et al.  Erosion, flooding and channel management in Mediterranean environments of southern Europe , 1997 .

[2]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  T. Schmid,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN EROSION RESEARCH: CALCULATION OF ROUGHNESS AND VOLUME BALANCE AT A LOGGED FOREST SITE , 2004 .

[4]  A. Klik,et al.  Soil surface roughness measurement—methods, applicability, and surface representation , 2005 .

[5]  H. Hirschmuller Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[6]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Digital close range photogrammetry for measurement of soil erosion , 2005 .

[7]  Wolfgang Boehler,et al.  Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy , 2005 .

[8]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  Differences in hillslope runoff and sediment transport rates within two semi-arid catchments in southeast Spain. , 2005 .

[9]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  J. Ponce,et al.  Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multi-View Stereopsis , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  H. Hirschmüller Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  G. Hancock,et al.  The measurement and modelling of rill erosion at angle of repose slopes in mine spoil , 2008 .

[13]  M. Kuhnert,et al.  Spatiotemporal variations of soil surface roughness from in-situ laser scanning , 2009 .

[14]  J. Poesen,et al.  The potential of 3D gully monitoring with GIS using high-resolution aerial photography and a digital photogrammetry system , 2009 .

[15]  NORBERT HAALA Haala 289 Comeback of Digital Image Matching , 2009 .

[16]  Soil erosion processes and sediment fluxes in a Mediterranean marl landscape, Campiña de Cádiz, SW Spain , 2009 .

[17]  G. Asner,et al.  Comparison of gully erosion estimates using airborne and ground-based LiDAR on Santa Cruz Island, California , 2010 .

[18]  C. Strecha,et al.  The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-light UAV Imagery , 2012 .

[19]  Alexander L. Densmore,et al.  Detection of surface change in complex topography using terrestrial laser scanning: application to the Illgraben debris‐flow channel , 2011 .

[20]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning soil surfaces: a field methodology to examine soil surface roughness and overland flow hydraulics , 2011 .

[21]  M. Menenti,et al.  Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2011 .

[22]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Irene Marzolff,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Evaluation of remotely‐sensed DEMs and modification based on plausibility rules and initial sediment budgets of an artificially‐created catchment , 2012 .

[25]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[26]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[27]  J. A. Gomez,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion , 2012 .

[28]  D. Faust,et al.  Holocene sediment fluxes in a fragile loess landscape (Saxony, Germany) , 2013 .

[29]  R. Barneveld,et al.  Assessment of terrestrial laser scanning technology for obtaining high‐resolution DEMs of soils , 2013 .