Intrinsic Shape Matching by Planned Landmark Sampling

Recently, the problem of intrinsic shape matching has received a lot of attention. A number of algorithms have been proposed, among which random‐sampling‐based techniques have been particularly successful due to their generality and efficiency. We introduce a new sampling‐based shape matching algorithm that uses a planning step to find optimized “landmark” points. These points are matched first in order to maximize the information gained and thus minimize the sampling costs. Our approach makes three main contributions: First, the new technique leads to a significant improvement in performance, which we demonstrate on a number of benchmark scenarios. Second, our technique does not require any keypoint detection. This is often a significant limitation for models that do not show sufficient surface features. Third, we examine the actual numerical degrees of freedom of the matching problem for a given piece of geometry. In contrast to previous results, our estimates take into account unprecise geodesics and potentially numerically unfavorable geometry of general topology, giving a more realistic complexity estimate.

[1]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1951 .

[2]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[3]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  The farthest point strategy for progressive image sampling , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Comparing and evaluating interest points , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[5]  Taku Komura,et al.  Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Carsten Moenning,et al.  Fast Marching farthest point sampling for implicit surfaces and point clouds , 2003 .

[7]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  The Correlated Correspondence Algorithm for Unsupervised Registration of Nonrigid Surfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[8]  Helmut Pottmann,et al.  Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective , 2004, SGP '04.

[9]  Jovan Popović,et al.  Deformation transfer for triangle meshes , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[10]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Comparing point clouds , 2004, SGP '04.

[11]  Michael Garland,et al.  Curvature maps for local shape comparison , 2005, International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2005 (SMI' 05).

[12]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[13]  Igor Guskov,et al.  Multi-scale features for approximate alignment of point-based surfaces , 2005, SGP '05.

[14]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Matching with PROSAC - progressive sample consensus , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[15]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Robust global registration , 2005, SGP '05.

[16]  H. Pottmann,et al.  Reassembling fractured objects by geometric matching , 2006, SIGGRAPH 2006.

[17]  Ron Kimmel,et al.  Generalized multidimensional scaling: A framework for isometry-invariant partial surface matching , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Mauro R. Ruggeri,et al.  Isometry-invariant Matching of Point Set Surfaces , 2008, 3DOR@Eurographics.

[19]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Non-Rigid Registration Under Isometric Deformations , 2008 .

[20]  Daniel Cohen-Or,et al.  Deformation‐Driven Shape Correspondence , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[21]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  Partial Similarity of Shapes Using a Statistical Significance Measure , 2009, IPSJ Trans. Comput. Vis. Appl..

[22]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A concise and provably informative multi-scale signature based on heat diffusion , 2009 .

[23]  T. Funkhouser,et al.  Möbius voting for surface correspondence , 2009, SIGGRAPH 2009.

[24]  Daniela Giorgi,et al.  Discrete Laplace-Beltrami operators for shape analysis and segmentation , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[25]  Mauro R. Ruggeri,et al.  Spectral-Driven Isometry-Invariant Matching of 3D Shapes , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[26]  H. Seidel,et al.  Isometric registration of ambiguous and partial data , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[27]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  One Point Isometric Matching with the Heat Kernel , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[28]  Takashi Matsuyama,et al.  Dynamic surface matching by geodesic mapping for 3D animation transfer , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.