Embryotoxicity testing of IVF disposables: how do manufacturers test?

STUDY QUESTION How do manufacturers perform embryotoxicity testing in their quality control programs when validating IVF consumables? SUMMARY ANSWER The Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) and Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA) used for IVF disposables differed from one manufacturer to another. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Many components used in IVF laboratories, such as culture media and disposable consumables, may negatively impact human embryonic development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Through a questionnaire-based survey, the main manufacturers of IVF disposable devices were contacted during the period November to December 2018 to compare the methodology of the MEA and HSSA. We focused on catheters for embryo transfer, catheters for insemination, straws, serological pipettes, culture dishes and puncture needles used in the ART procedures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We approached the manufacturers of IVF disposables and asked for details about methodology of the MEA and HSSA performed for toxicity testing of their IVF disposable devices. All specific parameters like mouse strains, number of embryos used, culture conditions (media, temperature, atmosphere), extraction protocol, subcontracting, and thresholds were registered and compared between companies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Twenty-one companies were approached, of which only 11 answered the questionnaire. Significant differences existed in the methodologies and thresholds of the MEA and HSSA used for toxicity testing of IVF disposables. Importantly, some of these parameters could influence the sensitivity of the tests. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although we approached the main IVF manufacturers, the response rate was relatively low. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study confirms the high degree of heterogeneity of the embryotoxicity tests performed by manufacturers when validating their IVF disposable devices. Currently, no regulations exist on this issue. Professionals should call for and request standardization and a future higher degree of transparency as regards embryotoxicity testing from supplying companies; moreover, companies should be urged to provide the users clear and precise information about the results of their tests and how testing was performed. Future recommendations are urgently awaited to improve the sensitivity and reproducibility of embryotoxicity assays over time. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study did not receive any funding. L.D. declares a competing interest with Patrick Choay SAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

[1]  M. Sentí,et al.  Parameters of the Mouse Embryo Assay that affect detection of peroxides in mineral oil. , 2019, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[2]  L. Smits,et al.  Association of culture medium with growth, weight and cardiovascular development of IVF children at the age of 9 years , 2018, Human reproduction.

[3]  P. V. Vardhan,et al.  FT-IR investigations on effect of high doses of gamma radiation-induced damage to polystyrene and mechanism of formation of radiolysis products , 2018, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[4]  D. Morbeck,et al.  Improved detection of mineral oil toxicity using an extended mouse embryo assay , 2017, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[5]  Sjoerd Repping,et al.  Influence of embryo culture medium (G5 and HTF) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome after IVF: a multicenter RCT. , 2016, Human reproduction.

[6]  J. Harper,et al.  Time to take human embryo culture seriously. , 2016, Human reproduction.

[7]  T. Fielder,et al.  Genetic mouse embryo assay: improving performance and quality testing for assisted reproductive technology (ART) with a functional bioassay , 2016, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[8]  P. Marianowski,et al.  Do We Pay Enough Attention to Culture Conditions in Context of Perinatal Outcome after In Vitro Fertilization? Up-to-Date Literature Review , 2016, BioMed research international.

[9]  D. Gardner,et al.  The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction. , 2016, Human reproduction update.

[10]  D. Rappolee,et al.  When Stresses Collide1 , 2013, Biology of reproduction.

[11]  L. Benson,et al.  Variability in protein quality used for embryo culture: embryotoxicity of the stabilizer octanoic acid. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  D. Morbeck,et al.  Mouse strain and quality control testing: improved sensitivity of the mouse embryo assay with embryos from outbred mice. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  D. Morbeck,et al.  Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress , 2012, Human reproduction.

[14]  Sjoerd Repping,et al.  Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  D. Morbeck Importance of Supply Integrity for In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Culture , 2012, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.

[16]  A. Holt,et al.  On the disruption of biochemical and biological assays by chemicals leaching from disposable laboratory plasticware. , 2012, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[17]  R. Schultz,et al.  Adult Body Weight Is Programmed by a Redox-Regulated and Energy-Dependent Process during the Pronuclear Stage in Mouse , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  A. Wetzels,et al.  Dutch technical specification (NTA 8070) on devices for assisted reproductive technologies. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[19]  D. Morbeck,et al.  Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standard quality control assays , 2010, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[20]  M. Nijs,et al.  Reprotoxicity of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer disposables and products: a 4-year survey. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  K. Chiba,et al.  Damage of embryo development caused by peroxidized mineral oil and its association with albumin in culture. , 2009, Fertility and Sterility.

[22]  A. Wetzels,et al.  Toxicity testing of human assisted reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay. , 2009, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[23]  I. Grabska-Liberek,et al.  An Evaluation of Sterilisation Processes , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[24]  Megan Mitchell,et al.  To QC or not to QC: the key to a consistent laboratory? , 2008, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[25]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  Manipulations of mouse embryos prior to implantation result in aberrant expression of imprinted genes on day 9.5 of development. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[26]  S. Lierman,et al.  Double-quality control reveals high-level toxicity in gloves used for operator protection in assisted reproductive technology. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[27]  Yasushi Nagai,et al.  Peroxidation of mineral oil used in droplet culture is detrimental to fertilization and embryo development. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  A. Wetzels,et al.  Sample size calculations for a split‐cluster, beta‐binomial design in the assessment of toxicity , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  D. Gardner,et al.  Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. , 2005, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[30]  L. Simmons,et al.  The rapid detection of cytotoxicity using a modified human sperm survival assay , 2005, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[31]  J. C. Andrews,et al.  A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality-control testing of water and culture media , 1988, Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

[32]  F. H. Hilton,et al.  Ham's F-10 constituted with tap water supports mouse conceptus development in vitro , 1987, Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

[33]  E. McLaughlin,et al.  In vitro fertilization: Fertilization failure due to toxic catheters , 1987, Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

[34]  J. Parinaud,et al.  Mouse system quality control is necessary before the use of new material for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer , 1987, Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

[35]  S. Ackerman,et al.  Toxicity testing for human in vitro fertilization programs , 1985, Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

[36]  A. Gutiérrez-Adán,et al.  Long-term effect of in vitro culture of mouse embryos with serum on mRNA expression of imprinting genes, development, and behavior. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  D. Ecker,et al.  Long-term effects of culture of preimplantation mouse embryos on behavior. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  C. D. De Jonge,et al.  Human sperm survival assay as a bioassay for the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory. , 2003, Journal of Andrology.

[39]  Gautam N. Allahbadia,et al.  The Art and Science of Assisted Reproductive Techniques , 2003 .

[40]  A. Gutiérrez-Adán,et al.  Effect of culture environment on embryo quality and gene expression - experience from animal studies. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[41]  K. Harrison,et al.  Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[42]  A. Steirteghem,et al.  O-205. Optimized mouse bioassays for the detection of embryology contaminants , 1999 .

[43]  Eal H. Lee Ion-beam modification of polymeric materials – fundamental principles and applications , 1999 .

[44]  T. Schimmel,et al.  Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[45]  P. Zavos,et al.  Factors that may influence the mouse embryo bioassay. , 1996, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  T. Bunch,et al.  Toxic effects of ethylene oxide residues on bovine embryos in vitro. , 1996, Toxicology.

[47]  D. Mortimer,et al.  The mouse embryo culture system: improving the sensitivity for use as a quality control assay for human in vitro fertilization. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[48]  B. Shirley,et al.  Reduction of embryotoxicity by protein in embryo culture media , 1991, Molecular reproduction and development.

[49]  R. Fissore,et al.  Mouse zygote development in culture medium without protein in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. , 1989, Biology of reproduction.

[50]  B. Lieberman,et al.  Quality control in an in-vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. , 1989, Human reproduction.

[51]  R. Lobo,et al.  Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[52]  R. Stillman,et al.  Factors influencing murine embryo bioassay: effects of proteins, aging of medium, and surgical glove coatings. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.

[53]  Kruger Tf,et al.  [A comparative study of two-cell embryos of CBA and F1 mice in a human in vitro fertilization program]. , 1984 .

[54]  L. Veeck,et al.  Culture of mouse preimplantation embryos as a quality control assay for human in vitro fertilization. , 1984 .

[55]  F. Stander,et al.  [A comparative study of two-cell embryos of CBA and F1 mice in a human in vitro fertilization program]. , 1984, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[56]  R. Dehaan Toxicity of tissue culture media exposed to polyvinyl chloride plastic. , 1971, Nature: New biology.