Use of CCD to Detect Terrestrial Cosmic Rays at Ground Level: Altitude vs. Underground Experiments, Modeling and Numerical Monte Carlo Simulation

In this work, we used a commercial charge-coupled device (CCD) camera to detect and monitor terrestrial cosmic rays at ground level. Multi-site characterization has been performed at sea level (Marseille), underground (Modane Underground Laboratory) and at mountain altitude (Aiguille du Midi-Chamonix Mont-Blanc at +3,780 m of altitude) to separate the atmospheric and alpha particle emitter's contributions in the CCD response. An additional experiment at avionics altitude during a long-haul flight has been also conducted. Experiment results demonstrate the importance of the alpha contamination in the CCD response at ground level and its sensitivity to charged particles. Experimental data as a function of CCD orientation also suggests an anisotropy of the particle flux for which the device is sensitive. A complete computational modeling of the CCD imager has been conducted, based on a simplified 3D CCD architecture deduced from a reverse engineering study using electron microscopy and physico-chemical analysis. Monte Carlo simulations evidence the major contribution of low energy (below a few MeV) protons and muons in the CCD response. Comparison between experiments and simulation shows a good agreement at ground level, fully validated at avionics altitudes with a much higher particle flux and a different particle cocktail composition.

[1]  Jeffrey T. Draper,et al.  Critical Charge Characterization for Soft Error Rate Modeling in 90nm SRAM , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[2]  L. Dilillo,et al.  Neutron-Induced Multiple Bit Upsets on Two Commercial SRAMs Under Dynamic-Stress , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  G. Gasiot,et al.  Random-Walk Drift-Diffusion Charge-Collection Model For Reverse-Biased Junctions Embedded in Circuits , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Philippe Roche,et al.  Factors that impact the critical charge of memory elements , 2006, 12th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS'06).

[5]  Philippe Roche,et al.  Technology downscaling worsening radiation effects in bulk: SOI to the rescue , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[6]  William C. McColgin,et al.  Bright-Pixel Defects in Irradiated CCD Image Sensors , 2007 .

[7]  R. Jones,et al.  Analyses of CCD images of nucleon-silicon interaction events , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  M. L. Alles,et al.  Technology scaling and soft error reliability , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS).

[9]  S. Platt,et al.  SEE-inducing effects of cosmic rays at the High-Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch compared to accelerated test data , 2007, 2007 9th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems.

[10]  Stefano Zucca,et al.  Modeling Charge Loss in CMOS MAPS Exposed to Non-Ionizing Radiation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Paul W. Marshall,et al.  Radiation-induced charge collection in infrared detector arrays , 2002 .

[13]  A. Lesea,et al.  The rosetta experiment: atmospheric soft error rate testing in differing technology FPGAs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability.

[14]  C. Inguimbert,et al.  STARDUST: A Code for the Simulation of Particle Tracks on Arrays of Sensitive Volumes With Substrate Diffusion Currents , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  Andrew D. Holland,et al.  Random telegraph signals in charge coupled devices , 2004 .

[16]  S P Platt,et al.  Modeling Neutron Interactions and Charge Collection in the Imaging Single-Event Effects Monitor , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  S. Platt,et al.  Application of Imaging Systems to Characterization of Single-Event Effects in High-Energy Neutron Environments , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  W. F. Dietrich,et al.  Ionization effect of solar particle GLE events in low and middle atmosphere , 2010 .

[19]  S. Platt,et al.  Design of a Detector for Characterizing Neutron Fields for Single-Event Effects Testing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  Arnaud Virazel,et al.  Evaluation of test algorithms stress effect on SRAMs under neutron radiation , 2012, 2012 IEEE 18th International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS).

[21]  J.M. Pimbley,et al.  Charge detection modeling in solid-state image sensors , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[22]  G. Hubert,et al.  Atmospheric Radiation Environment Analyses Based-on CCD Camera, Neutron Spectrometer and Multi-Physics Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[23]  E. W. Enlow,et al.  The relationship of holding points and a general solution for CMOS latchup , 1992 .

[24]  D. Munteanu,et al.  The Plateau de Bure Neutron Monitor: Design, Operation and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[25]  Gilles Gasiot,et al.  Comparisons of soft error rate for SRAMs in commercial SOI and bulk below the 130-nm technology node , 2003 .

[26]  G. Tsiligiannis,et al.  Multiple Cell Upset Classification in Commercial SRAMs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[27]  David K. Gilmore,et al.  Radiation events in astronomical CCD images , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[28]  Jae Pil Jung,et al.  SOFT ERROR ISSUE AND IMPORTANCE OF LOW ALPHA SOLDERS FOR MICROELECTRONICS PACKAGING , 2013 .

[29]  A. Mohammadzadeh,et al.  A CCD miniature radiation monitor , 2002 .

[30]  Lembit Sihver,et al.  Development of PARMA: PHITS-based Analytical Radiation Model in the Atmosphere , 2008, Radiation research.

[31]  Sebastien Martinie,et al.  Behavioral modeling of SRIM tables for numerical simulation , 2014 .

[32]  Lin Jing,et al.  Master's degree thesis , 2010 .

[33]  G. Gasiot,et al.  Real-time Soft-Error testing of 40nm SRAMs , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS).

[34]  S. P. Platt,et al.  Development and application of a neutron sensor for single event effects analysis , 2005 .

[35]  N. Gopalswamy,et al.  GROUND LEVEL ENHANCEMENT IN THE 2014 JANUARY 6 SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENT , 2014, 1406.7172.

[36]  Henry H. K. Tang,et al.  SEMM-2: A new generation of single-event-effect modeling tools , 2008, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[37]  Z. Torok,et al.  Analysis of SEE-Inducing Charge Generation in the Neutron Beam at The Svedberg Laboratory , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[38]  P. Roche,et al.  Altitude and Underground Real-Time SER Characterization of CMOS 65 nm SRAM , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[39]  Wei Chen,et al.  Modelling Neutron Interactions in the Imaging SEE Monitor , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[40]  Arnaud Virazel,et al.  Advanced Test Methods for SRAMs: Effective Solutions for Dynamic Fault Detection in Nanoscaled Technologies , 2009 .

[41]  Arnaud Virazel,et al.  Error Resilient Infrastructure for Data Transfer in a Distributed Neutron Detector , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems.

[42]  A. Chugg,et al.  Webcam observations of SEE events at the Jungfraujoch research station , 2007, 2007 9th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems.

[43]  L. Artola,et al.  Continuous High-Altitude Measurements of Cosmic Ray Neutrons and SEU/MCU at Various Locations: Correlation and Analyses Based-On MUSCA SEP$^{3}$ , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.