Sample size and Markowitz diversification

A lthough more than a quarter of a cen18 2 r r E tury has passed since Markowitz presented his concept of diversification and an algorithm for selecting assets within a mathematical optimization framework [21], the implementation of his approach still seems to have been retarded by the volume of data needed and the computational effort required.’ Therefore, this study investigates the effect of sample size on the efficient frontier in order to assess the marginal benefit of working with larger and larger efficient sets. The results suggest that, on the basis of a single index model to develop informational inputs for common stocks, the marginal benefit of increased sample size is slight beyond a couple of hundred securities. Markowitz’s full covariance model requires expected returns, standard deviations of returns, and expected covariances between all asset returns as data inputs. A quadratic programming algorithm is then applied to the data to identify efficient portfolios. In order to reduce the computational and data requirements, a number of modifications have been proposed

[1]  J. Jobson,et al.  Putting Markowitz theory to work , 1981 .

[2]  John D. Martin,et al.  BETA NONSTATIONARITY AND PURE EXTRA-MARKET COVARIANCE EFFECTS ON PORTFOLIO RISK , 1980 .

[3]  Herbert E. Phillips,et al.  Portfolio Selection: An Analytic Approach for Selecting Securities from a Large Universe , 1980, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[4]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  On the Estimation and Stability of Beta , 1980, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[5]  Richard W. McEnally,et al.  ASPECTS OF CORPORATE BOND PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION , 1979 .

[6]  Edwin J. Elton,et al.  Are Betas Best , 1978 .

[7]  Optimal Portfolios from Simple Ranking Devices , 1978 .

[8]  A Reevaluation of Alternative Portfolio Selection Models Applied to Common Stocks , 1978 .

[9]  G. J. Alexander OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS December 1977 MIXED SECURITY TESTING OF ALTERNATIVE PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODELS , 2009 .

[10]  Keith H. Johnson,et al.  How to Beat Those Index Funds , 1977 .

[11]  William P. Lloyd,et al.  JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS September 1977 A TEST OF STONE'S TWO-INDEX MODEL OF RETURNS , 2009 .

[12]  Arthur J. Keown,et al.  Interest Rate Sensitivity and Portfolio Risk , 1977, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[13]  T. Hansen The derivation of efficient sets , 1977 .

[14]  John P. Seagle,et al.  Performance of the Sharpe Portfolio Selection Model: A Comparison , 1976, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[15]  John D. Martin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MARKET RISK ON PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION , 1975 .

[16]  K. H. Johnson,et al.  A note on diversification and the reduction of dispersion , 1974 .

[17]  Bernell K. Stone,et al.  Systematic Interest-Rate Risk in a Two-Index Model of Returns , 1974, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[18]  Nancy L. Jacob A Limited-Diversification Portfolio Selection Model for the Small Investor , 1974 .

[19]  E. Elton,et al.  ESTIMATING THE DEPENDENCE STRUCTURE OF SHARE PRICES —IMPLICATIONS FOR PORTFOLIO SELECTION , 1973 .

[20]  Portfolio Selection in a Dynamic and Uncertain World , 1972 .

[21]  John L. Evans,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION AND THE REDUCTION OF DISPERSION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 1968 .

[22]  Kalman J. Cohen,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Portfolio-Selection Models , 1967 .

[23]  W. Sharpe A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis , 1963 .