Bridging Task Expressions and Search Queries

People engage in search episodes as they have a task or a problematic situation. Often this task is not clearly expressed by the information seeker, nor directly supported by the search system. People also list their tasks using tools such as to-do applications, and while many of these could be search tasks, there is a lack of that recognition or a possible bridge to a search system. In the work reported here, we aim to create that bridge by analyzing data on both sides. In task management, we examined 1,000 to-do tasks annotated by human assessors for their appropriateness for a search engine and created a simple process to learn that classification. In search, we analyzed millions of queries in a search engine log to understand how often queries represent tasks that people express in to-do lists. Our results show that (1) we can accurately predict which of the to-do tasks are appropriate as search queries; and (2) such tasks do indeed show up in search engines as a substantial segment. Together, these findings outline an opportunity to link explicitly expressed tasks to search queries and vice versa. This has implications for both task completion and query understanding.

[1]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Microtask Detection , 2021, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  ProactiveTasks: the short of mobile device use sessions , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[3]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Task Duration Estimation , 2019, WSDM.

[4]  Steven Diamond,et al.  TaskGenies: Automatically Providing Action Plans Helps People Complete Tasks , 2012, TCHI.

[5]  Yang Song,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of search task trails , 2012, WWW.

[6]  Benjamin Rey,et al.  Generating query substitutions , 2006, WWW '06.

[7]  Shawon Sarkar,et al.  Identifying and Predicting the States of Complex Search Tasks , 2020, CHIIR.

[8]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Toon Calders,et al.  Discovering temporal hidden contexts in web sessions for user trail prediction , 2013, WWW.

[10]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Analyzing and Predicting Task Reminders , 2016, UMAP.

[11]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[12]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  An Intelligent Personal Assistant for Task and Time Management , 2007, AI Mag..

[13]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  What a to-do: studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager , 2004, CHI.

[14]  Chirag Shah,et al.  The Paradox of Personalization: Does Task Prediction Require Individualized Models? , 2018, CHIIR.

[15]  Bhuva Narayan,et al.  Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval , 2012 .

[16]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Work tasks as units for analysis in information seeking and retrieval studies , 2002 .

[17]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[18]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  The roles of digital libraries in teaching and learning , 1995, CACM.

[19]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Predicting User Tasks : I Know What You ’ re Doing ! , 2005 .

[20]  Elaine Toms Task-based information searching and retrieval , 2011, Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval.

[21]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Search behaviors in different task types , 2010, JCDL '10.

[22]  Hong Xie,et al.  Planned and Situated Aspects in Interactive IR: Patterns of User Interactive Intentions and Information Seeking Strategies , 1997 .

[23]  Chirag Shah,et al.  User Activity Patterns During Information Search , 2015, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Task Completion Detection: A Study in the Context of Intelligent Systems , 2019, SIGIR.

[25]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Task, Information Seeking Intentions, and User Behavior: Toward A Multi-level Understanding of Web Search , 2019, CHIIR.

[26]  Chirag Shah,et al.  The Broad View of Task Type Using Path Analysis , 2018, ICTIR.

[27]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Bridging Gaps: Predicting User and Task Characteristics from Partial User Information , 2019, SIGIR.

[28]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Daqing He,et al.  Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search session: changes in user behavior by task and over time , 2014, SIGIR.

[30]  Katriina Byström,et al.  Approaches to task in contemporary information studies , 2007, Inf. Res..

[31]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Supporting Complex Search Tasks , 2014, CIKM.