Comparative experimental investigation on steel staggered-truss constructed with different joints in fire

Abstract A total of three fire tests have been conducted to compare the mechanical performance of the steel staggered-truss (SST) exposed to pool fire constructed with welded joints and gusset plate connections. The data of temperatures and deflections of typical members were recorded during the three tests. The experimental results showed that the performance of the connections had a significant influence on the mechanical behavior of the structure under elevated temperatures. The truss constructed with gusset plate connections (TRG) possesses better fire performance than the truss adapted with welded joints (TRW) because the gusset plate connection has better resistance capacity in fire than the welded joint does. Particularly, a chain of destruction might be aroused in the TRW due to local buckling and joint fracture, and then the progressive collapse of the whole structure might be induced. However, better coordination of the truss members is shown in the TRG because the gusset plate connections possess better hinged performance in fire, and the instantaneous damage of the structure was not induced; though the failure of some specific members was observed. The difference in the manifestation of the local buckling between the TRW and TRG was also found through the tests. That is, in-plane local buckling was observed in the TRW, while either in-plane or out-plane local buckling might be induced in the TRG.

[1]  Ian Burgess,et al.  Experimental investigation of the behaviour of fin plate connections in fire , 2009 .

[2]  Khalifa S. Al-Jabri,et al.  An artificial neural network model for predicting the behaviour of semi-rigid joints in fire , 2009 .

[3]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1A) , 2008 .

[4]  Yong Wang,et al.  Experimental study of structural fire behaviour of steel beam to concrete filled tubular column assemblies with different types of joints , 2007 .

[5]  Yong Wang,et al.  An experimental study of relative structural fire behaviour and robustness of different types of steel joint in restrained steel frames , 2011 .

[6]  Guo-Qiang Li,et al.  A practical approach for fire resistance design of extended end-plate joints , 2008 .

[7]  Roger J. Plank,et al.  Tying capacity of web cleat connections in fire, Part 1: Test and finite element simulation , 2009 .

[8]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Experimental study of the mechanical behavior of steel staggered truss system under pool fire conditions , 2011 .

[9]  Yong Wang,et al.  Effects of partial fire protection on temperature developments in steel joints protected by intumescent coating , 2009 .

[10]  Roger J. Plank,et al.  Thermal and structural behaviour of a full-scale composite building subject to a severe compartment fire , 2007 .

[11]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Experimental behaviors of steel staggered-truss system exposed to fire under lateral force , 2012 .

[12]  Daxu Zhang,et al.  Experimental study on mechanical behavior of an impacted steel tubular T-joint in fire , 2011 .

[13]  Pang-An Hsiao,et al.  Fire response of steel semi-rigid beam–column moment connections , 2009 .

[14]  Xuhong Zhou,et al.  Experimental study and numerical analyses on seismic behaviors of staggered-truss system under low cyclic loading , 2009 .

[15]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Inelastic behavior of staggered truss systems , 2007 .