Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.

1. Responses of neurons in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the barbiturate anesthetized adult cat were studied using cochlear stimulation with electrical and acoustic stimuli. Acoustic stimulation of the ear ipsilateral to the studied cortical hemisphere with brief biphasic clicks was compared with electrical stimulation of the contralateral cochlea with brief biphasic electrical pulses delivered via a feline cochlear prosthesis. The contralateral ear was deafened immediately before implantation of the cochlear prosthesis. The feline cochlear prosthesis consisted of four bipolar electrode pairs and was placed in the scala tympani. Two bipolar electrode conditions were used for stimulation: one near radial pair with electrode spacing of approximately 0.5 mm, and one longitudinal pair with electrode spacing of approximately 6 mm. 2. The firing rates obtained from single- and multiple-neuron recordings were measured as a function of stimulus intensity for single electrical and acoustic pulses. Resulting rate/level functions were characterized by a fast growing low-level segment and a more slowly growing, saturating, or decreasing high-level segment. The slopes of these two segments as well as the stimulus level and firing rate at the juncture of these two segments (the transition point) provide a complete characterization of the response magnitude behavior as a function of stimulus intensity. 3. The main characteristics of rate/level functions obtained with electrical and acoustic cochlear stimulation were quite similar. However, for any given neuron, differences in the primary growth behavior, such as monotonic or nonmonotonic growth, could be observed between the different stimulation modes. 4. Response latencies from single- and multiple-neuron recordings were obtained as a function of stimulus intensity for electrical and acoustic pulses. Resulting latency/level functions were characterized by a rapidly decreasing low-level segment and a more slowly decreasing high-level segment. The slopes of these two segments as well as the stimulus level and response latency at the juncture of these two segments (the transition point) provide a complete characterization of the response latency behavior as a function of stimulus intensity. Transition point levels for the rate/level function and the latency/level were nearly identical. 5. The characteristic latency behavior for each neuronal response was found to be very similar for acoustic and electrical stimulation. Correlation analysis revealed a close relationship between latency parameters of the two electrical stimulation conditions, a weaker relationship between the longitudinal electrical and the acoustic conditions, and the weakest relationship between the radial electrical and acoustic conditions. 6. Correlation analysis for rate and latency parameters revealed several relationships between these response aspects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat. , 1974, Brain research.

[2]  K J Doyle,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SIGNAL PROCESSING BY THE HOUSE–URBAN SINGLE‐CHANNEL STIMULATOR ON AUDITORY PERCEPTION ABILITIES OF PATIENTS WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Shamma,et al.  Organization of response areas in ferret primary auditory cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  B. Manly Multivariate Statistical Methods : A Primer , 1986 .

[5]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Topography of excitatory bandwidth in cat primary auditory cortex: single-neuron versus multiple-neuron recordings. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  Magnetic fields from the auditory cortex of a deaf human individual occurring spontaneously or evoked by stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[7]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Cortical coding of repetitive acoustic pulses. , 1972, Brain research.

[8]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[9]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses from a deaf subject to stimuli presented through a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[10]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli , 1987, Hearing Research.

[11]  G. Topp,et al.  Single Fiber Recordings from the Cat Auditory Nerve with Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea at Different Stimulus Places , 1987 .

[12]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: distribution of integrated excitation. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  B J Gantz,et al.  Word recognition performance with single-channel and multichannel cochlear implants. , 1989, The American journal of otology.

[14]  Schindler Ra,et al.  The UCSF/Storz cochlear implant: patient performance. , 1987 .

[15]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[17]  P. Doyle,et al.  The cochlear implant: a comparison of single-channel and multichannel results. , 1991, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[18]  D P Phillips,et al.  Responses of single neurons in physiologically defined primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: frequency tuning and responses to intensity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D P Phillips,et al.  Effect of tone-pulse rise time on rate-level functions of cat auditory cortex neurons: excitatory and inhibitory processes shaping responses to tone onset. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  D. Irvine,et al.  Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[23]  J. L. Hollett,et al.  Repetition rate and signal level effects on neuronal responses to brief tone pulses in cat auditory cortex. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  AUDITORY RESULTS WITH SINGLE‐CHANNEL IMPLANTS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Some neural mechanisms in the cat's auditory cortex underlying sensitivity to combined tone and wide-spectrum noise stimuli , 1985, Hearing Research.

[26]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Binaural response-specific bands in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: Topographical organization orthogonal to isofrequency contours , 1980, Brain Research.

[27]  Shinjiro Oonishi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION AND INTEGRATIVE MECHANISM ON THE AUDITORY CORTEX OF THE CAT , 1965 .

[28]  I. Glass Tuning characteristics of cochlear nucleus units in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1983, Hearing Research.

[29]  C. Parkins,et al.  Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys , 1989, Hearing Research.

[30]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[31]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Neurons in the cat's primary auditory cortex distinguished by their responses to tones and wide-spectrum noise , 1985, Hearing Research.

[32]  R. Tyler,et al.  Audiological Management and Performance of Adult Cochlear-Implant Patients , 1992, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[33]  Ben M. Clopton,et al.  Unit responses at cochlear nucleus to electrical stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis , 1984, Hearing Research.

[34]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation , 1990, Hearing Research.

[35]  F. Zeng,et al.  Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation , 1992, Hearing Research.