Analysis of the Third Transmembrane Domain of the Human Type 1 Angiotensin II Receptor by Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis*

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TMD) following agonist binding. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which is a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TMD helices. Using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method, we identified the residues within the third TMD of the wild-type angiotensin II (AT1) receptor that contribute to the formation of the binding site pocket. Each residue within the Ile103–Tyr127 region was mutated one at a time to a cysteine. Treating the A104C, N111C, and L112C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) strongly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD3 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active AT1 receptor. Indeed, two additional mutants (S109C and V116C) were found to be sensitive to MTSEA treatment. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes a minor counterclockwise rotation of TMD3, thereby exposing residues, which are not present in the inactive state, to the binding pocket. This pattern of accessibility of residues in the TMD3 of the AT1 receptor parallels that of homologous residues in rhodopsin. This study identified key elements of TMD3 that contribute to the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors through structural rearrangements.

[1]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[2]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Rhodopsin activation blocked by metal-ion-binding sites linking transmembrane helices C and F , 1996, Nature.

[3]  A. Karlin,et al.  Acetylcholine receptor channel structure probed in cysteine-substitution mutants. , 1992, Science.

[4]  E. Escher,et al.  Analysis of the adrenal angiotensin II receptor with the photoaffinity labeling method. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[5]  M. Burnier,et al.  Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers , 2001, Circulation.

[6]  P Ghanouni,et al.  Agonist-induced conformational changes in the G-protein-coupling domain of the β2 adrenergic receptor , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R. Seifert,et al.  Constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors: cause of disease and common property of wild-type receptors , 2002, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[8]  D. Osguthorpe,et al.  Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase‐trimethoprim, a drug‐receptor system , 1988, Proteins.

[9]  B. Maigret,et al.  Mutation of Asn111 in the Third Transmembrane Domain of the AT1A Angiotensin II Receptor Induces Its Constitutive Activation* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Structural mimicry in G protein-coupled receptors: implications of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin for structure-function analysis of rhodopsin-like receptors. , 2001, Molecular pharmacology.

[11]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[12]  H. Rasmussen,et al.  The temporal integration of the aldosterone secretory response to angiotensin occurs via two intracellular pathways. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[14]  D. Farrens,et al.  Conformational Changes in Rhodopsin , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Bryan L Roth,et al.  Evidence for a Model of Agonist-induced Activation of 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2A Serotonin Receptors That Involves the Disruption of a Strong Ionic Interaction between Helices 3 and 6* 210 , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  S. Miura,et al.  Molecular analysis of the structure and function of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. , 2003, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[17]  K. Catt,et al.  International union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors. , 2000, Pharmacological reviews.

[18]  H A Scheraga,et al.  A computer modeling postulated mechanism for angiotensin II receptor activation , 1995, Journal of protein chemistry.

[19]  S. Ball,et al.  The Conformational Change Responsible for AT1 Receptor Activation Is Dependent upon Two Juxtaposed Asparagine Residues on Transmembrane Helices III and VII* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  K. Catt,et al.  Angiotensin-stimulated production of inositol trisphosphate isomers and rapid metabolism through inositol 4-monophosphate in adrenal glomerulosa cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  S. Miura,et al.  Constitutive Activation of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Alters the Orientation of Transmembrane Helix-2* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  P Ghanouni,et al.  Mutation of a highly conserved aspartic acid in the beta2 adrenergic receptor: constitutive activation, structural instability, and conformational rearrangement of transmembrane segment 6. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  T. Inagami,et al.  A review of mutagenesis studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor, the three‐dimensional receptor model in search of the agonist and antagonist binding site and the hypothesis of a receptor activation mechanism , 1997, Journal of hypertension.

[24]  P. Fraker,et al.  Protein and cell membrane iodinations with a sparingly soluble chloroamide, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3a,6a-diphrenylglycoluril. , 1978, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  Robert Fredriksson,et al.  High Affinity Agonistic Metal Ion Binding Sites within the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Illustrate Conformational Change of Transmembrane Region 3* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  J. Javitch,et al.  A cysteine residue in the third membrane-spanning segment of the human D2 dopamine receptor is exposed in the binding-site crevice. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  B. Kobilka,et al.  G Protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  G. Liapakis,et al.  Use of the substituted cysteine accessibility method to study the structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[29]  Jonathan A Javitch,et al.  Mapping the binding-site crevice of the dopamine D2 receptor by the substituted-cysteine accessibility method , 1995, Neuron.

[30]  S. Miura,et al.  Mechanism of constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor: influence of the size of the agonist switch binding residue Asn(111). , 1998, Biochemistry.

[31]  Pierre Lavigne,et al.  Constitutive Activation of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Alters the Spatial Proximity of Transmembrane 7 to the Ligand-binding Pocket* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Activation of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Involves Disruption of an Ionic Lock between the Cytoplasmic Ends of Transmembrane Segments 3 and 6* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  R. Leduc,et al.  Residues 293 and 294 are ligand contact points of the human angiotensin type 1 receptor. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[34]  R. Leduc,et al.  Photolabeling identifies position 172 of the human AT(1) receptor as a ligand contact point: receptor-bound angiotensin II adopts an extended structure. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[35]  J. Klein-Seetharaman,et al.  Structure and function in rhodopsin: mapping light-dependent changes in distance between residue 65 in helix TM1 and residues in the sequence 306-319 at the cytoplasmic end of helix TM7 and in helix H8. , 2001, Biochemistry.