Use of Drivers’ Jerk Profiles in Computer Vision–Based Traffic Safety Evaluations

A traffic conflict is usually composed of a chain of events in which at least one of the involved road users performs some sort of evasive action to avoid a collision. An evasive action usually involves powerful braking, which leads to sudden, negative change in acceleration (deceleration). The temporal dynamics (variation over time) of the acceleration of a vehicle is represented by the jerk profile. More formally, jerk is the derivative of the acceleration. In the case of an evasive action by braking, the jerk profile is characterized by strong, negative values. This study examined two issues in the quest to understand the benefits of evasive action analysis. The first issue was whether jerk profiles can be used to identify critical traffic events (conflicts). The second issue addressed the validity of the assumption that the deceleration profile is inadequate as a stand-alone measure for conflict identification. Automated video analysis was used to collect traffic data and analysis was applied on two data sets with distinct traffic patterns. The study revealed a significant difference between the jerk behavior of the groups of drivers involved in conflictive and normal traffic interactions. It also showed instances in which automated jerk evaluation was successful in finding conflicts undetected by conventional conflict indicators. The same could not be demonstrated for the road users’ deceleration behavior. These findings support earlier studies on the shortcomings of the use of deceleration data for conflict identification.

[1]  Henrik Hagelin,et al.  Detection of Critical Events Using Limited Sensors , 2012 .

[2]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data , 2009 .

[3]  Melissa J. Williams,et al.  Validity of the traffic conflicts technique , 1981 .

[4]  Stuart R Perkins,et al.  Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections , 1968 .

[5]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[6]  Steven G Shelby,et al.  Delta-V as a Measure of Traffic Conflict Severity , 2011 .

[7]  Christer Hydén,et al.  Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A framework for automated road-users classification using movement trajectories , 2013 .

[9]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program data , 2011 .

[10]  Bruce H. Wilson,et al.  Method for Identifying Vehicle Movements for Analysis of Field Operational Test Data , 2004 .

[11]  A. af Wåhlberg Speed choice versus celeration behavior as traffic accident predictor. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[12]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  Measurement of traffic conflicts , 1997 .

[13]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A feature-based tracking algorithm for vehicles in intersections , 2006, The 3rd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV'06).

[14]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Assessing safety critical braking events in naturalistic driving studies , 2013 .

[15]  Carlos Canudas-de-Wit,et al.  A Safe Longitudinal Control for Adaptive Cruise Control and Stop-and-Go Scenarios , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  A. Wåhlberg The relation of acceleration force to traffic accident frequency: a pilot study , 2000 .

[17]  Christine Buisson,et al.  New Filtering Method for Trajectory Measurement Errors and Its Comparison with Existing Methods , 2012 .

[18]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  SURROGATE MEASURES OF SAFETY , 2009 .

[20]  Gerald Brown,et al.  Traffic conflicts for road user safety studies , 1994 .

[21]  SaunierNicolas,et al.  A methodology for precise camera calibration for data collection applications in urban traffic scenes , 2013 .

[22]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Jerky driving--An indicator of accident proneness? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .

[24]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[25]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Safety evaluation of right-turn smart channels using automated traffic conflict analysis. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Jonathan M Hankey,et al.  A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Estimation of the severity of safety critical events. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Jeffery Archer,et al.  Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling : a study of urban and suburban intersections , 2005 .

[29]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions , 2010 .

[30]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Traffic conflict standards for intersections , 1999 .

[31]  Håkan Ardö,et al.  Application of automated video analysis for behavioural studies: concept and experience , 2009 .