Modeling and analyzing neural signals with phase variability using Fisher-Rao registration

BACKGROUND The Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) has recently been introduced to analyze neural signals such as EEG and fMRI where phase variability plays an important role in the data. New method: In this study, we propose to adopt a more powerful method, referred to as the Fisher-Rao Registration (FRR), to study the phase variability. Comparison with existing methods: We systematically compare FRR with DTW in three aspects: 1) basic framework, 2) mathematical properties, and 3) computational efficiency. RESULTS We show that FRR has superior performance in all these aspects and the advantages are well illustrated with simulation examples. CONCLUSIONS We then apply the FRR method to two real experimental recordings - one fMRI and one EEG data set. It is found the FRR method properly removes the phase variability in each set. Finally, we use the FRR framework to examine brain networks in these two data sets and the result demonstrates the effectiveness of the new method.

[1]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso , 2006, math/0608017.

[2]  J. Marron,et al.  Registration of Functional Data Using Fisher-Rao Metric , 2011, 1103.3817.

[3]  Laleh Najafizadeh,et al.  Capturing dynamic patterns of task-based functional connectivity with EEG , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  B. Li,et al.  A Nonparametric Graphical Model for Functional Data With Application to Brain Networks Based on fMRI , 2018, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[6]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  B. Jansen,et al.  EEG waveform analysis by means of dynamic time-warping. , 1985, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[8]  S. Chiba,et al.  Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition , 1978 .

[9]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[12]  Catie Chang,et al.  Introducing co-activation pattern metrics to quantify spontaneous brain network dynamics , 2015, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[15]  David T. Jones,et al.  Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Discovering Precise Temporal Patterns in Large-Scale Neural Recordings through Robust and Interpretable Time Warping , 2020, Neuron.

[17]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory , 2004 .

[18]  Petra Hermann,et al.  Resting State fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis Using Dynamic Time Warping , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[19]  Hyonho Chun,et al.  On an Additive Semigraphoid Model for Statistical Networks With Application to Pathway Analysis , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[20]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Algorithms for Sparse Nonnegative Tucker Decompositions , 2008, Neural Computation.

[21]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity revealed by resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[22]  Shella D. Keilholz,et al.  The Neural Basis of Time-Varying Resting-State Functional Connectivity , 2014, Brain Connect..

[23]  Wei Wu,et al.  Generative models for functional data using phase and amplitude separation , 2012, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[24]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  The future of FMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[25]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[26]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: Methodology and comparison with fcMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[28]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[30]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Jin-Ting Zhang,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Functional Data , 2013 .

[32]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Altered regional blood volume in chronic cannabis smokers. , 2006, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Ding,et al.  Lasting connectivity increase and anxiety reduction via transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2018, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[35]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[36]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[37]  Xinghao Qiao,et al.  Functional Graphical Models , 2018, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[38]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  Vesa Kiviniemi,et al.  A Sliding Time-Window ICA Reveals Spatial Variability of the Default Mode Network in Time , 2011, Brain Connect..

[40]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Linear-nonlinear-time-warp-poisson models of neural activity , 2018, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[41]  David J. Sharp,et al.  Novel Modeling of Task vs. Rest Brain State Predictability Using a Dynamic Time Warping Spectrum: Comparisons and Contrasts with Other Standard Measures of Brain Dynamics , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[42]  L. Gupta,et al.  Nonlinear alignment and averaging for estimating the evoked potential , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.