World Turned Upside Down: Entrepreneurial Decline, Its Reluctant Myths and Troubling Realities

The aim of this paper is to attempt to understand why the popular academic and policy field of promoting, studying and evangelising “entrepreneurship” should have been associated with great success but, in the past twenty years or more in many advanced economies, so much failure. From the US to lesser and developing countries, emerging economies and the European Union, entrepreneurship, especially in regard to start-ups and particularly high-tech start-ups, has been in constant more or less recent decline. This is seldom registered in the mainstream literature where a positive and benign profile is generally presented. The paper examines this phenomenon, ties it partly with the “productivity paradox” and seeks tentative hypotheses in relation to the apparent illusions if not delusions regarding “entrepreneurship”.

[1]  J. Galbraith.  The Affluent Society , 1958 .

[2]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  How Firms Respond to Business Cycles : The Role of the Firm Age and Firm Size , 2012 .

[3]  E. Stam.  Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique , 2015 .

[4]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[5]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[6]  Ron S. Jarmin,et al.  Where Has All the Skewness Gone? The Decline in High-Growth (Young) Firms in the U.S , 2015 .

[7]  Chiara Criscuolo,et al.  The Dynamics of Employment Growth: New Evidence from 18 Countries , 2014 .

[8]  Pierre St-Amant,et al.  Firm Dynamics and Multifactor Productivity: An Empirical Exploration , 2018 .

[9]  Ron S. Jarmin,et al.  The Role of Entrepreneurship in US Job Creation and Economic Dynamism , 2014 .

[10]  Hans‐Michael Trautwein,et al.  Neoclassical economics , 2018, A Short History of Economic Thought.

[11]  Kristijan Kotarski,et al.  The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy , 2011 .

[12]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[13]  Charles R Meyer,et al.  Inside the black box. , 2008, Minnesota medicine.

[14]  A. Alchian.  Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  John G. Fernald.  Productivity and Potential Output before, during, and after the Great Recession , 2012, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[16]  M. Bursnall,et al.  How Dynamic is the Private Sector? Job Creation and Insights from Workplace-Level Data , 2013, National Institute Economic Review.

[17]  R. Gordon,et al.  The Rise and Fall of American Growth , 2016 .

[18]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy , 2020, Contributions to Political Economy.

[19]  Jonathan Tepper,et al.  The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Competition , 2018 .

[20]  D. Hecker,et al.  High-Technology Employment: A NAICS-Based Update: Among High-Technology Industries-Those with a High Proportion of Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians-Some Are Projected to Grow Rapidly; Overall, However, This Group of Industries Is Expected to Continue to Grow Slowly , 2005 .

[21]  Erik Hurst,et al.  What Do Small Businesses Do? , 2011 .

[22]  M. Ricketts.  The Captured Economy: How the Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth, and Increase Inequality by Brink Lindsey and Steven M. Teles. Oxford University Press (2017), 221 pp. ISBN: 978-0190627768 (hb, £16.99). , 2018, Economic Affairs.

[23]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  Market Selection, Reallocation, and Restructuring in the U.S. Retail Trade Sector in the 1990s , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.