Ultrasonic imaging algorithms with limited transmission cycles for rapid nondestructive evaluation

Imaging algorithms recently developed in ultrasonic nondestructive testing (NDT) have shown good potential for defect characterization. Many of them are based on the concept of collecting the full matrix of data, obtained by firing each element of an ultrasonic phased array independently, while collecting the data with all elements. Because of the finite sound velocity in the test structure, 2 consecutive firings must be separated by a minimum time interval. Depending on the number of elements in a given array, this may become problematic if data must be collected within a short time, as it is often the case, for example, in an industrial context. An obvious way to decrease the duration of data capture is to use a sparse transmit aperture, in which only a restricted number of elements are used to transmit ultrasonic waves. This paper compares 2 approaches aimed at producing an image on the basis of restricted data: the common source method and the effective aperture technique. The effective aperture technique is based on the far-field approximation, and no similar approach exists for the near-field. This paper investigates the performance of this technique in near-field conditions, where most NDT applications are made. First, these methods are described and their point spread functions are compared with that of the total focusing method (TFM), which consists of focusing the array at every point in the image. Then, a map of efficiency is given for the different algorithms in the nearfield. The map can be used to select the most appropriate algorithm. Finally, this map is validated by testing the different algorithms on experimental data.

[1]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review , 2006 .

[2]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Jeffrey L. Krolik,et al.  SPARSE ARRAY IMAGING OF CHANGE‐DETECTED ULTRASONIC SIGNALS BY MINIMUM VARIANCE PROCESSING , 2009 .

[4]  B. S. Robinson,et al.  Synthetic focus imaging using partial datasets , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[5]  Richard Bamler,et al.  A comparison of range-Doppler and wavenumber domain SAR focusing algorithms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  L. J. Busse,et al.  Review and discussion of the development of synthetic aperture focusing technique for ultrasonic testing (SAFT-UT) , 1984 .

[7]  F. Gran,et al.  Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Optimizing the radiation pattern of sparse periodic linear arrays , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Analytic evaluation of sampled aperture ultrasonic imaging techniques for NDE , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  The wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix imaging using an ultrasonic array , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  H. Torp,et al.  Which transducer array is best , 1995 .

[12]  R. T. Hoctor,et al.  The unifying role of the coarray in aperture synthesis for coherent and incoherent imaging , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  Robin Clark,et al.  Rail flaw detection: overview and needs for future developments , 2004 .

[14]  Bin Chen,et al.  A novel method to design sparse linear arrays for ultrasonic phased array. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[15]  F.S. Foster,et al.  Optimizing the radiation pattern of sparse periodic two-dimensional arrays , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Sparse array imaging with spatially-encoded transmits , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[17]  Martin Spies,et al.  Boosting the application of ultrasonic arrays , 2002 .

[18]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation , 2005 .

[19]  Vera Behar,et al.  Analysis and Optimization of Medical Ultrasound Imaging Using the Effective Aperture Approach , 2005 .