Identifying and remediating deficiencies in problem-solving in Statics

The work described in this paper is part of a multi-year study that seeks to enhance students’ ability to create ‘models’ successfully as they solve problems in Statics. The ultimate goal of the study is to understand the major difficulties that students encounter as they learn to model during problem-solving in Statics and to create interventions to help them more quickly overcome those difficulties. In the first phase of the study, more than 300 students completed three inventories: math skills, spatial reasoning and statics concepts. The results from the inventories were used to identify clusters of students with common characteristics, and therefore, presumably common deficiencies in their problem solving in Statics. Students from each cluster were then invited to participate in think-aloud problem solving sessions to identify the weaknesses in their problem solving. Analysis of the think-aloud sessions identified a number of common issues in students’ knowledge and ability to create models, which are summarized in the paper. Based on these findings, the research team identified possible interventions to address the common issues. Two of these interventions were developed through a design experiments process in which they were tested with groups of up to 30 students, refined to enhance their effectiveness, and then re-tested. The interventions and the development process are described, and results from the final round of the design experiments are presented.

[1]  Renata S. Engel,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VISUALIZATION SKILL TRAINING ON GENDER AND RETENTION IN ENGINEERING , 1998 .

[2]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Interrelationship of Knowledge, Interest, and Recall: Assessing a Model of Domain Learning , 1995 .

[3]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  A Cognitive Study Of Modeling During Problem Solving , 2006 .

[4]  Andrew N. Hrymak,et al.  Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem Solving Program , 1997 .

[5]  James G. Greeno,et al.  On The Nature of Competence: Principles for Understanding in a Domain© , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[6]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[7]  Donald R. Woods,et al.  An Evidence‐Based Strategy for Problem Solving , 2000 .

[8]  M. Prosser,et al.  Relationship between Students' Conceptual Knowledge and Study Strategies--Part 2: Student Learning in Biology. , 1991 .

[9]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[10]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[11]  S. Danielson,et al.  Work in Progress - A Statics Skills Inventory , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[12]  Sheryl A. Sorby A COURSE IN SPATIAL VISUALIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RETENTION OF FEMALE ENGINEERING STUDENTS , 2001 .

[13]  Paul S. Steif,et al.  A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis , 2005 .

[14]  Sheryl A. Sorby,et al.  The Development and Assessment of a Course for Enhancing the 3‐D Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students , 2000 .

[15]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Francesco Costanzo,et al.  Problem Solving In Statics And Dynamics: A Proposal For A Structured Approach , 2005 .

[17]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  AC 2007-1617: EFFECTS OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, MATH AND VISUALIZATION SKILLS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING IN STATICS , 2007 .

[18]  P.S. Steif,et al.  An articulation of the concepts and skills which underlie engineering statics , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..