Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an Unconference

An academic conference is a traditional platform for researchers and professionals to network and learn about recent developments and trends in a particular academic field [1–4]. Typically, the organizing committees and sponsors decide the main theme and sub-topics of the conference and select the presenters based on peer-reviewed papers [5]. The selected speakers usually share their research with a large audience by means of presentations and posters. However, the most stimulating discussions generally take place over coffee breaks when attendees can interact with each other and discuss various topics, including their own research interests, in a more informal manner [1, 6, 7], while expanding their own professional networks. An emphasis on facilitating such informal/networking interactions is a central focus of “unconventional conferences”—or “unconferences.” While many people may not yet have taken part in an unconference, the concept has been around for more than two decades. Events with unconference formats, beginning as early as 1985, include Open Space Technology, Foo Camp, BarCamp, Birds of a Feather, EdCamp, ScienceOnline, and many others. The success of these events has made the unconference format increasingly popular and widely known [8–11]. Unlike traditional conferences, an unconference is a participant-oriented meeting where the attendees decide on the agenda, discussion topics, workshops, and, often, even the time and venues. The informal and flexible program allows participants to suggest topics of their own interest and choose sessions accordingly. The format provides an excellent opportunity for researchers from diverse disciplines to work collaboratively on topics of common interest. The overarching goal for most unconferences is to prioritize conversation over presentation. In other words, the content for a session does not come from a select number of individuals at the front of the room, but is generated by all the attendees within the room, and, as such, every participant has an important role. Advantages of the unconference format include: a focus on topics that are relevant to the attendees (because they suggested them), an opportunity for teamwork development, flexibility of schedule, and an emphasis on contributions from every participant. The relationships built during an unconference often continue well past the event. The interactions can lead to productive collaborations, professional development opportunities, and a network of resources and are very effective at building a community amongst participants. The unconference format, therefore, gives participants experience in working together, and this can change how they think about their day-to-day work. A range of articles offer tips and advice for organizing and delivering aspects of scientific conferences and meetings or observations on features of successful meetings [5, 12, 13], including several from the PLOS Computational Biology “Ten Simple Rules” collection [14–16]. While the rules presented in this article are of particular relevance to the organization of unconferences, several of these points are also useful and complementary guidelines for organizing other kinds of events.

[1]  J Wyatt Organising a medical conference. , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[2]  A day off in Denmark , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[3]  Harrison Owen,et al.  Expanding Our Now: The Story of Open Space Technology. First Edition. , 1997 .

[4]  Bruce Alberts Designing Scientific Meetings , 2013, Science.

[5]  W A Cutting How To Do It: Participate in an international conference , 1995, BMJ.

[6]  Wilfred Drew Mob Rule Learning: Camps, Unconferences, and Trashing the Talking Head , 2011 .

[7]  David Stuart Mob Rule Learning: Camps, Unconferences and Trashing the Talking Head , 2012 .

[8]  Aidan Budd,et al.  Biggest challenges in bioinformatics , 2013, EMBO reports.

[9]  Marion O. Adebiyi,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Organizing a Virtual Conference—Anywhere , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Foo's paradise , 2006, Nature.

[11]  Janet H. Potvin,et al.  Planning and organizing an annual conference , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[12]  Sangya Pundir,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Running Interactive Workshops , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Grant N. Pierce The dilemma of attending (or not) scientific conferences. , 2014, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[14]  Jorge Lazareff,et al.  How I Do It , 2014, Surgical Neurology International.

[15]  Ellen McIntyre,et al.  Convening a conference--facilitating networking among delegates. , 2007, Australian family physician.

[16]  Gregory A. Petsko,et al.  The highs and lows of scientific conferences , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Organizing a Scientific Meeting , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Tarun Mishra,et al.  Building the Future of Bioinformatics through Student-Facilitated Conferencing , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Harrison H. Owen,et al.  Open Space Technology: A User's Guide , 1993 .

[20]  Karthik Ram,et al.  Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science , 2013, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.