Benchmarking bio-inspired designs with brainstorming in terms of novelty of design outcomes

With the increasing demand of innovative products in the market, there is a need for effective creativity approaches that will support development of creative design outcomes. Most researchers agree that novelty of design concepts is a major element of creativity; design outcomes are more creative when they are more novel. Biomimetics has emerged as a creativity approach that can lead to generation of novel design concepts. However, not many researchers explored how the degree of novelty of the concepts generated using biomimetic approaches compare with the degree of novelty of concepts generated using existing traditional creative problem solving approaches. In this research we have compared the novelty of design concepts produced by using biological analogies with the novelty of design concepts produced by using traditional brainstorming. Results show that there is an increase in the percentage of highly novel concepts produced in a design task, as well as the novelty of the concept space, when biological analogies are used over traditional brainstorming.

[1]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[2]  Thomas Hesselberg,et al.  Biomimetics and the case of the remarkable ragworms , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[3]  S. Isaksen,et al.  A Reexamination of Brainstorming Research: Implications for Research and Practice , 2005 .

[4]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A methodology for supporting “transfer” in biomimetic design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[5]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[6]  John S. Gero,et al.  Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design , 1994, Formal Design Methods for CAD.

[7]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .

[8]  Lloyd W. Fernald,et al.  The Creative Process: Its Use and Extent of Formalization by Corporations , 1993 .

[9]  Torben Anker Lenau Biomimetics as a Design Methodology - Possibilities and Challenges , 2009 .

[10]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Creativity's camel: The role of analogy in invention. , 1997 .

[11]  Kazem Chaharbaghi,et al.  Developing creative teams for operational excellence , 1996 .

[12]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Sapphire – an Approach to Analysis and Synthesis , 2009 .

[13]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach , 1994 .

[14]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods , 2012 .

[15]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Identification and application of requirements and their impact on the design process: a protocol study , 2004 .

[16]  Torben Anker Lenau,et al.  ENGINEERING DESIGN OF AN ADAPTIVE LEG PROSTHESIS USING BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES , 2010 .

[17]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Investigating novelty–outcome relationships in engineering design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[18]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[19]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A New Approach to Structure Sharing , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[20]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[21]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Studying Engineering Design Creativity- Developing a Common Definition and Associated Measures , 2008 .

[22]  L. H. Shu,et al.  TOWARDS BIOMIMETIC CONCEPT GENERATION , 2001 .

[23]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[24]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A framework for understanding creativity in requirements engineering , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[25]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[26]  Hernan Casakin,et al.  Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process. Expert versus novice performance , 2004 .