An efficient hybrid push-pull methodology for peer-to-peer video live streaming system on mobile broadcasting social media

With the rapid growth of wireless communication technology, the availability of highly flexible and video-friendly mobile terminal platforms (such as smartphones and tablets), the emergence of major video content providers (like YouTube, Ustream, and PPTV, which provide a large catalog of attractive contents), Peer-to-Peer (P2P) live video streaming over the wireless and Internet is becoming more and more attractive to users. One of the main challenges is to provide a good quality of service though the dynamic behavior of the network. Traditionally, tree-based model uses a push method, that broadcaster transfers data to other users. This model has low start-up delay. However, there are two main problems in this method: if the bandwidth of an internal node is low, children nodes may lose data and when an internal node failure, other nodes can’t receive data until completing the recovery of the tree. On the other hand, mesh-based model uses a pull method, has low bandwidth of a neighbor node by pulling necessary data from a number of neighbor nodes. However, mesh-based model requires large buffers to support pull data from neighbor peers and there is an adjustment between minimum delay by sending pull request and overhead of whole system. So, both models have their own strengths and weaknesses. This paper proposes a new hybrid push-pull live P2P video streaming protocol called MobileCast that combines the benefits of pull and push mechanisms for live video delivery. We present new topology for P2P network with more stable and provide better video streaming quality. Our main goal is to minimize the network end-to-end delay, startup time, overhead, packet loss compared to the pure mesh networks, pure tree networks and provide a good quality of service though the dynamic behavior of the network.

[1]  Sanghyun Park,et al.  An Efficient P2P-based Mobile Social Media Delivery for Real-time MobileCast , 2014 .

[2]  Bin Fan,et al.  The design trade-offs of BitTorrent-like file sharing protocols , 2009, TNET.

[3]  K. Lakshmi Devi Live Streaming With Receiver-Based Peer-Division Multiplexing , 2014 .

[4]  Bo Li,et al.  CoolStreaming/DONet: a data-driven overlay network for peer-to-peer live media streaming , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[5]  Reza Rejaie,et al.  PRIME: peer-to-peer receiver-driven mesh-based streaming , 2009, TNET.

[6]  Yi Liang,et al.  Balancing Performance and Fairness in P2P Live Video Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[7]  Yonggwan Won,et al.  Topology and Architecture Design for Peer to Peer Video Live Streaming System on Mobile Broadcasting Social Media , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA).

[8]  Chonggang Wang,et al.  Coordinate Live Streaming and Storage Sharing for Social Media Content Distribution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[9]  Yuan Xue,et al.  Locality-Awareness in BitTorrent-Like P2P Applications , 2009, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[10]  Paul Francis,et al.  Chunkyspread: Heterogeneous Unstructured Tree-Based Peer-to-Peer Multicast , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

[11]  Jiangchuan Liu,et al.  Exploring interest correlation for peer-to-peer socialized video sharing , 2012, TOMCCAP.