Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks.

OBJECTIVE To obtain a quantitative estimate of the impact on infectious complications of using transparent dressings with intravenous catheters. DATA SOURCES Meta-analysis of all studies published in the English literature, including abstracts, letters, and reports that examined the primary research question of infection risks associated with transparent compared with gauze dressings for use on central and peripheral venous catheters. Studies were identified by use of the MEDLINE database using the indexing terms occlusive dressings, transparent dressings, and infection and by review of referenced bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION Seven of the 15 studies (47%) of central venous catheters and seven of 12 studies (58%) of peripheral catheters met our inclusion criteria for analysis. All studies used a prospective cohort design, utilized hospitalized patients, and reported at least one of our defined outcomes. EXTRACTION Data for each study were abstracted independently by three investigators. At least three studies were used in the analysis of each outcome. DATA SYNTHESIS Applying a Mantel-Haenszel chi 2 analysis, use of transparent dressings on central venous catheters was significantly associated with an elevated relative risk (RR) of catheter tip infection (RR = 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38 to 2.30). Catheter-related sepsis (RR = 1.69; 95% CI, 0.97 to 2.95) and bacteremia (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.76 to 3.47) were both associated with an elevated RR. Use of transparent dressings on peripheral catheters was associated with an elevated RR of catheter-tip infection (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.99) but not phlebitis (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.20), infiltration (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.37), or skin colonization (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.09). CONCLUSION The results demonstrated a significantly increased risk of catheter-tip infection with the use of transparent compared with gauze dressings when used with either central or peripheral catheters. An increased risk of bacteremia and catheter sepsis associated with the use of transparent compared with gauze dressings for use on central venous catheters was suggested.

[1]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[2]  H. Richet,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  F Mosteller,et al.  Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental Results , 1990, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  S. Smith,et al.  Clinically significant central venous catheter infections in a community hospital: association with type of dressing. , 1989, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  J. Conly,et al.  A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. , 1989, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  T. Einarson,et al.  A Method for Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies , 1988, Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy.

[7]  G. Young,et al.  Catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition: the safety of long-term OpSite dressings. , 1988, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[8]  R. Wenzel,et al.  Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings. , 1988, American journal of infection control.

[9]  R. Sherertz,et al.  Vascular-access infections in hospitalized patients. , 1988, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[10]  M. Ringer,et al.  Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. , 1987, JAMA.

[11]  K A L'Abbé,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical research. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  K. Charles,et al.  Intravenous cannula fixing and dressing--comparison between the use of transparent polyurethane dressing and conventional technique. , 1987, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[13]  P. Herlevsen,et al.  A comparative study of 'Op-site' and 'Nobecutan gauze' dressings for central venous line care. , 1986, The Journal of hospital infection.

[14]  W. R. Mccabe,et al.  A Randomized Study Comparing a Transparent Polyurethane Dressing to a Dry Gauze Dressing for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Sites , 1985, Infection Control.

[15]  M. Kelsey,et al.  A comparison of the morbidity associated with occlusive and non-occlusive dressings applied to peripheral intravenous devices. , 1985, The Journal of hospital infection.

[16]  K. Kudsk,et al.  Op-Site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day Op-Site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[17]  M. Katich,et al.  Local infection of the intravenous-cannulae wound associated with transparent dressings. , 1985, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  G. Hill,et al.  Catheter‐related sepsis in patients on intravenous nutrition: A prospective study of quantitative catheter cultures and guidewire changes for suspected sepsis , 1985, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  G. Doern,et al.  Effects of dressing type and change interval on intravenous therapy complication rates. , 1984, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[20]  L. Bishop,et al.  Infection and peripheral venous catheterization. , 1983, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[21]  Peterson Pj,et al.  Use of a transparent polyurethane dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter care. , 1982 .

[22]  W. A. Edwards,et al.  Use of op site as an occlusive dressing for total parenteral nutrition catheters. , 1982, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[23]  H. Maibach,et al.  Effect of prolonged occlusion on the microbial flora, pH, carbon dioxide and transepidermal water loss on human skin. , 1978, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[24]  D. Maki,et al.  A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  R. Horwitz,et al.  Resolving conflicting clinical trials: guidelines for meta-analysis. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  K. McCredie,et al.  Comparison of transparent dressing to paper tape dressing over central venous catheter sites. , 1986, NITA.

[27]  P. Fabri,et al.  Evaluation of Opsite catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized study. , 1982, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.