An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units

This paper presents a two-stage model for fully ranking organizational units where each unit has multiple inputs and outputs. In the first stage, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is run for each pair of units separately. In the second stage, the pairwise evaluation matrix generated in the first stage is utilized to rank scale the units via the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). The consistency of this AHP/DEA evaluation can be tested statistically. Its goodness of fit with the DEA classification (to efficient/inefficient) can also be tested using non-parametric tests. Both DEA and AHP are commonly used in practice. Both have limitations. The hybrid model AHP/DEA takes the best of both models, by avoiding the pitfalls of each. The nonaxiomatic utility theory limitations of AHP are irrelevant here: since we are working with given inputs and outputs of units, no subjective assessment of a decision maker evaluation is involved. AHP/DEA ranking does not replace the DEA classification model, rather it furthers the analysis by providing full ranking in the DEA context for all units, efficient and inefficient.

[1]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA , 1992 .

[2]  J. Barzilai,et al.  Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives , 1987 .

[3]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[4]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Expected utility: An anniversary and a new era , 1988 .

[5]  W. Cook,et al.  Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation , 1996 .

[6]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making , 1993 .

[8]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Demystifying DEA — A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multiple Criteria Analysis , 1993 .

[9]  Michael Norman,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance , 1991 .

[10]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Decision Making with Multiple Objectives , 1985 .

[11]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[12]  Valerie Belton,et al.  An Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis With Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 1992 .

[13]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Academic departments efficiency via DEA , 1994, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  W. Cook,et al.  A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings , 1990 .

[15]  J. Dyer.  Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[16]  R. L. Winkler.  Decision modeling and rational choice: AHP and utility theory , 1990 .

[17]  J. Cubbin,et al.  Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1992 .

[18]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[21]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Discrete Multiattribute Utility Approach to Project Selection , 1987 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Feature Article - Decision Analysis: An Overview , 1982, Oper. Res..

[23]  Theodor J. Stewart.  Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making: A response , 1994 .

[24]  Muhittin Oral,et al.  A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects , 1991 .

[25]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[26]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  A Dea Model For Measuring The Relative Eeficiency Of Highway Maintenance Patrols , 1990 .

[27]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[28]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[29]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .