Multi-physics and multi-scale methods used in nuclear reactor analysis

Abstract In an operating nuclear reactor core, various physical phenomena of different nature are interrelated. Multi-physics calculations that account for the interrelated nature of the neutronic and thermal–hydraulic phenomena are of major importance in reactor safety and design and as a result a special effort is developed within the nuclear engineering scientific community to improve their efficiency and accuracy. In addition, the strongly heterogeneous nature of reactor cores involves phenomena of different scales. The interaction between different scales is a specificity of these systems, since a local perturbation might influence the behavior of the whole core, or a global perturbation can influence the properties of the media on all scales. As a consequence, multi-scale calculations are required in order to take the reactor core multi-scale nature into account. It should be mentioned that the multi-physics nature of a nuclear reactor cannot be separated from the multi-scale one in the framework of computational nuclear engineering as reactor design and safety require computational tools which are able to examine globally the complicated nature of a nuclear reactor in various scales. In this work a global overview of the current status of two-physics (neutronic/thermal–hydraulic) and multi-scale neutronic calculations techniques is presented with reference to their applications in different nuclear reactor concepts. Finally an effort to extract the main remaining challenges in the field of multi-physics and multi-scale calculations is made.

[1]  P. Blaise,et al.  APOLLO2.8 : A VALIDATED CODE PACKAGE FOR PWR NEUTRONICS CALCULATIONS , 2009 .

[2]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[3]  Dalin Zhang,et al.  Coupled Neutronics/Thermal-Hydraulics for Analysis of Molten Salt Reactor , 2013 .

[4]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  Improved cross-section modeling methodology for coupled three-dimensional transient simulations , 2002 .

[5]  I. Toumi,et al.  FLICA-4: a three-dimensional two-phase flow computer code with advanced numerical methods for nuclear applications , 2000 .

[6]  Lanfranco Monti,et al.  Development of a coupled neutronic/thermal-hydraulic tool with multi-scale capabilities and applications to HPLWR core analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Glen Hansen,et al.  Parallel multiphysics algorithms and software for computational nuclear engineering , 2009 .

[8]  Werner Maschek,et al.  Molten salt related extensions of the SIMMER-III code and its application for a burner reactor , 2006 .

[9]  I. Faragó A modified iterated operator splitting method , 2008 .

[10]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  Progress in the development of an implicit steady state solution in the coupled code TRACE/PARCS , 2013 .

[11]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  Transient characteristics of small molten salt reactor during blockage accident , 2006 .

[12]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  DYN3D-MSR spatial dynamics code for molten salt reactors , 2007 .

[13]  Marco Enrico Ricotti,et al.  A multi-physics modelling approach to the dynamics of Molten Salt Reactors , 2011 .

[14]  H. Finnemann,et al.  Fast analytical flux reconstruction method for nodal space-time nuclear reactor analysis , 1992 .

[15]  Masato Watanabe,et al.  Three-dimensional pin power reconstruction for the axially heterogeneous region in BWR , 2006 .

[16]  Mohammad Rahgoshay,et al.  Introducing and validating a new method for coupling neutronic and thermal-hydraulic calculations , 2010 .

[17]  M. Avramova,et al.  Challenges in coupled thermal-hydraulics and neutronics simulations for LWR safety analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Gérald Rimpault,et al.  THE ERANOS CODE AND DATA SYSTEM FOR FAST REACTOR NEUTRONIC ANALYSES , 2002 .

[19]  J. Ragusa,et al.  Consistent and accurate schemes for coupled neutronics thermal-hydraulics reactor analysis , 2009 .

[20]  W. Arnoldi The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem , 1951 .

[21]  D. Bestion,et al.  NURESIM – A European simulation platform for nuclear reactor safety: Multi-scale and multi-physics calculations, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis , 2011 .

[22]  T. Downar,et al.  A MATRIX-FREE NEWTON METHOD FOR COUPLED NEUTRONICS THERMAL-HYDRAULICS REACTOR ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[23]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  Steady State Analysis of Small Molten Salt Reactor , 2005 .

[24]  R. J. Cena,et al.  COBRA-IV-I: an interim version of COBRA for thermal-hydraulic analysis of rod bundle nuclear fuel elements and cores , 1976 .

[25]  M. Dahmani,et al.  Verification and validation of the flux reconstruction method for CANDU® applications , 2011 .

[26]  Forrest B. Brown,et al.  On-the-Fly Doppler Broadening for Monte Carlo Codes , 2012 .

[27]  Robert Stieglitz,et al.  Coupling of COBAYA3/SUBCHANFLOW inside the NURESIM platform and validation using selected benchmarks , 2014 .

[28]  Ilse C. F. Ipsen,et al.  THE IDEA BEHIND KRYLOV METHODS , 1998 .

[29]  José-María Aragonés,et al.  A domain decomposition methodology for pin by pin coupled neutronic and thermal―hydraulic analyses in COBAYA3 , 2010 .

[30]  A. Zolfaghari,et al.  Coupled neutronic thermal–hydraulic transient analysis of accidents in PWRs , 2012 .

[31]  Vincent A. Mousseau,et al.  Implicitly balanced solution of the two-phase flow equations coupled to nonlinear heat conduction , 2004 .

[32]  Haileyesus Tsige-Tamirat,et al.  Coupled Neutronics Thermal-Hydraulics Analysis using Monte Carlo and Sub-channel Codes , 2012 .

[33]  Uwe Imke,et al.  Validation of the Subchannel Code SUBCHANFLOW Using the NUPEC PWR Tests (PSBT) , 2012 .

[34]  William R. Martin,et al.  CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR WHOLE-CORE MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[35]  D. Keyes,et al.  Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications , 2004 .

[36]  Jean-Marie Seynhaeve,et al.  A first assessment of the NEPTUNE_CFD code: Instabilities in a stratified flow comparison between the VOF method and a two-field approach , 2008 .

[37]  Piero Ravetto,et al.  A full-core coupled neutronic/thermal-hydraulic code for the modeling of lead-cooled nuclear fast reactors , 2013 .

[38]  E. Fridman,et al.  Coupled neutronic thermo-hydraulic analysis of full PWR core with Monte-Carlo based BGCore system , 2011 .

[39]  Ilse C. F. Ipsen,et al.  GMRES and the minimal polynomial , 1996 .

[40]  C. Demazière Multi-physics modelling of nuclear reactors: current practices in a nutshell , 2013 .

[41]  R. Forster,et al.  MCNP™ Version 5 , 2004 .