Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships.

We examined the quantitative influence of carefully controlled alterations in end-diastolic volume and afterload resistance on multiple simultaneously determined ejection and isovolumetric phase indexes of left ventricular contractile function in 23 isolated supported canine ventricles. The influence of load change on each index was compared with its sensitivity to inotropic stimulation, and this sensitivity was in turn contrasted to the response of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR). Experimental data demonstrated various degrees of load sensitivity among the indexes, with a generally curvilinear relationship between load and index response for both preload and afterload alterations. The curvilinear nature of these relationships meant that over a select range of loading, many indexes demonstrated relative load independence. They also often displayed greater sensitivity to inotropic change than the ESPVR, and both factors help explain their enduring clinical utility. To further explore the influence of load and contractile state on several of the indexes, we developed a theoretical analysis, using variables common to pressure-volume relationships, in which these dependencies could be derived. The theoretical models fit very well with the experimental data, and reaffirmed the frequently curvilinear nature of the relationships. We conclude that while many clinical indexes of ventricular contractile function show significant load dependence, the information they provide can be reasonably interpreted within defined ranges of load and inotropic alteration. Any advantage of the ESPVR will derive not from the magnitude of its response to inotropic change, which is smaller than most other indexes, but from its relative insensitivity to load alteration over a wider range of load.

[1]  J. Ross,et al.  Application of end-systolic pressure-volume and pressure-wall thickness relations in conscious dogs. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  R. O'rourke,et al.  The effect of vasoactive agents on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation in closed-chest dogs. , 1986, Circulation.

[3]  W. Little,et al.  The Left Ventricular dP/dtmax‐End‐Diastolic Volume Relation in Closed‐Chest Dogs , 1985, Circulation research.

[4]  D. Glower,et al.  Linearity of the Frank-Starling relationship in the intact heart: the concept of preload recruitable stroke work. , 1985, Circulation.

[5]  K. Sagawa,et al.  Optimal Arterial Resistance for the Maximal Stroke Work Studied in Isolated Canine Left Ventricle , 1985, Circulation research.

[6]  W L Maughan,et al.  Effect of Arterial Impedance Changes on the End‐Systolic Pressure, Volume Relation , 1984, Circulation research.

[7]  W L Maughan,et al.  Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  H Suga,et al.  End-systolic pressure/volume ratio: a new index of ventricular contractility. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  W Grossman,et al.  Contractile State of the Left Ventricle in Man as Evaluated from End‐systolic Pressure‐Volume Relations , 1977, Circulation.

[10]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Influence of Acute Changes in Preload, Aftertoad, Contractile State and Heart Rate on Eection and Isovohumlc Indices of Myocardial Contractility in Man , 1976, Circulation.

[11]  H. Suga,et al.  Instantaneous Pressure‐Volume Relationships and Their Ratio in the Excised, Supported Canine Left Ventricle , 1974, Circulation research.

[12]  J. Ross,et al.  Factors influencing indices of left ventricle contractility in the conscious dog. , 1974, Cardiovascular research.

[13]  F. Kiil,et al.  Preload, contractility, and afterload as determinants of stroke volume during elevation of aortic blood pressure in dogs. , 1973, Cardiovascular research.

[14]  K. Peterson,et al.  On the Assessment of Cardiac Inotropic State , 1973, Circulation.

[15]  I. Mirsky,et al.  General index for the assessment of cardiac function. , 1972, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  L. Dexter,et al.  Alterations in Preload and Myocardial Mechanics in the Dog and in Man , 1972, Circulation research.

[17]  D T Mason,et al.  Assessment of Cardiac Contractility: The Relation Between the Rate of Pressure Rise and Ventricular Pressure During Isovolumic Systole , 1971, Circulation.

[18]  D T Mason,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of the rate of rise of intraventricular pressure (dp-dt) in the evaluation of myocardial contractility in man. , 1969, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  J Ross,et al.  Contractile State of the Left Ventricle in Man: Instantaneous Tension‐Velocity‐Length Relations in Patients With And Without Disease of the Left Ventricular Myocardium , 1968, Circulation research.

[20]  John Ross,et al.  Contractile State of the Heart Characterized by Force‐Velocity Relations in Variably Afterloaded and Isovolumic Beats , 1966 .