Chapter 2. Coordination of linguistic subsystems as a sign of automatization?

This study explored retrodictively differences in developmental patterns between a learner who makes some progress and one that does not. Their twelve successive writings were analyzed on holistically scored measures of complexity, accuracy, fluency, idiomaticity, and coherence (CAFIC) and on two analytical measures to operationalize syntactic and lexical complexity. Their developmental trajectories were explored with visual graphs (LOESS curves), Monte Carlo analyses, and correlational analyses. The stronger learner showed rather synchronous development in most measures and a significant jump in lexical complexity (operationalized as average word length), suggesting a level of coordination of subsystems and therefore automaticity of the system as a whole. The weaker learner, on the other hand, showed more competitive or random patterns in the measures.

[1]  Paul van Geert,et al.  Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data , 2002 .

[2]  Marjolijn H. Verspoor,et al.  Individual Differences and the Ergodicity Problem , 2018, Language Learning.

[3]  Marjolijn Verspoor,et al.  An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development , 2016 .

[4]  Marjolijn Verspoor,et al.  Variability and Variation in Second Language Acquisition Orders: A Dynamic Reevaluation , 2015 .

[5]  Richard Watson Todd,et al.  Measuring the Coherence of Writing Using Topic-Based Analysis. , 2004 .

[6]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[7]  Nina Vyatkina,et al.  The Development of Second Language Writing Complexity in Groups and Individuals: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study , 2012 .

[8]  Gary G Fogal,et al.  Investigating Variability in L2 Development: Extending a Complexity Theory Perspective on L2 Writing Studies and Authorial Voice , 2020, Applied Linguistics.

[9]  Marjolijn H. Verspoor,et al.  Chunk use and development in advanced Chinese L2 learners of English , 2018 .

[10]  Marianne Spoelman,et al.  Dynamic Patterns in Development of Accuracy and Complexity: A Longitudinal Case Study in the Acquisition of Finnish , 2010 .

[11]  Ryo Nitta,et al.  Phase Transitions in Development of Writing Fluency From a Complex Dynamic Systems Perspective , 2014 .

[12]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English , 2006 .

[13]  Marjolijn Verspoor,et al.  Variability in Second Language Development From a Dynamic Systems Perspective , 2008 .

[14]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  An ESL Index of Development , 1978 .

[15]  P. V. van Geert,et al.  Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: a quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intra-individual variability in early grammatical development. , 2007, Developmental science.

[16]  Wander Lowie,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[17]  Paul van Geert,et al.  A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. , 1991 .

[18]  Esther Thelen,et al.  Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. , 1987 .