Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants.

Gene flow in plant populations is largely determined by landscape heterogeneity. Both the shape of the pollination kernel and the spatial distribution of trees affect the distribution of pollen grains and the genotypes they harbour, but little is known about the relative contribution of each of these two factors. Using genetic markers we build a spatial network of pollination events between any two trees in a population of Prunus mahaleb, an insect-pollinated plant. Then, we apply tools from the science of complex networks to characterize the structure of such a mating network. Although the distribution of the number of pollen donors per tree is quite homogeneous, the identity of donors is distributed heterogeneously across the population. This results in a population structured in well-defined modules or compartments, formed by a group of mother trees and their shared pollen donors. Long-distance pollination events decrease the modular structure by favouring mating among all available mates. This increases gene flow across the entire population, reducing its genetic structure, and potentially decreasing the role of genetic drift.

[1]  P. Jordano.  Pollination biology of Prunus mahaleb L.: deferred consequences of gender variation for fecundity and seed size , 1993 .

[2]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  L. Harder,et al.  Ecology and evolution of plant mating. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Robert M May,et al.  Network structure and the biology of populations. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[6]  Cyril Dutech,et al.  Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[8]  J. Nason,et al.  Population Graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[9]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Nason,et al.  The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations , 1993 .

[12]  J. Bascompte.  Networks in ecology , 2007 .

[13]  P. Gouyon,et al.  Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[14]  T. Knürr,et al.  Gene Flow and Local Adaptation in Trees , 2007 .

[15]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  An information-theoretic framework for resolving community structure in complex networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[17]  P. Smouse,et al.  Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between phi(ft), pollen dispersal and interfemale distance. , 2001, Genetics.

[18]  Robert S. Schick,et al.  Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network , 2007 .

[19]  P. Jordano,et al.  Contemporary pollen and seed dispersal in a Prunus mahaleb population: patterns in distance and direction , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[20]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[21]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[22]  P. Jordano,et al.  Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[23]  P. Jordano,et al.  Frugivore-generated seed shadows: a landscape view of demographic and genetic effects. , 2002 .

[24]  V. Sork,et al.  Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  N. Frascaria-Lacoste,et al.  Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[26]  R. Alía,et al.  Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[27]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  P. Jordano,et al.  Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[29]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[31]  S. Liepelt,et al.  Wind-dispersed pollen mediates postglacial gene flow among refugia , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.