Self-Efficacy, Emotions and Work Engagement Among Teachers: A Two Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis

The aim of this study was to examine the reciprocal relations between teachers’ work engagement and their emotions, both positive and negative, and experienced in relation to their students, by implementing a two-wave panel design. The predictive role of self-efficacy with respect to teachers’ emotions and work engagement was also explored. The study included a sample of 941 teachers from various state schools in Croatia. A cross-lagged analysis demonstrated the reciprocal nature of the relationship between emotions and work engagement. Teachers who reported higher levels of positive emotions of joy, pride and love at first time point, tended to be more engaged in their work at subsequent assessment. The association between negative emotions and work engagement showed the opposite direction—teachers who experienced more anger, fatigue, and hopelessness in the first measurement point, were also less engaged at second time of assessment. Furthermore, teachers who were more engaged in their work in the first time point, also reported about lower levels of negative emotions but higher levels of positive emotions 6 months later. At last, teachers with higher perceived self-efficacy are more engaged in their work, experience more joy, pride and love, and less anger, fatigue and hopelessness, towards their students. However, these effects did not hold upon control of baseline levels of emotions and work engagement.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Guy Roth,et al.  Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. , 2007 .

[3]  A. Bakker,et al.  Burnout and Work Engagement among Teachers. , 2006 .

[4]  B. Fredrickson The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[5]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[6]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Flowing Together: A Longitudinal Study of Collective Efficacy and Collective Flow Among Workgroups , 2014, The Journal of psychology.

[7]  Chris Kyriacou,et al.  Teacher Stress: Directions for future research , 2001 .

[8]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Don't leave your heart at home , 2012 .

[9]  A. Slišković,et al.  A mixed-method approach to the assessment of teachers’ emotions: development and validation of the Teacher Emotion Questionnaire , 2018 .

[10]  E. Rosenberg Levels of Analysis and the Organization of Affect , 1998 .

[11]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  H. Weiss,et al.  Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. , 1996 .

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[14]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism , 2009 .

[15]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  “Yes, I Can, I Feel Good, and I Just Do It!” On Gain Cycles and Spirals of Efficacy Beliefs, Affect, and Engagement: EFFICACY BELIEFS, AFFECT, ENGAGEMENT , 2011 .

[16]  Li-tze Hu,et al.  Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. , 2001 .

[17]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  International handbook of emotions in education. , 2014 .

[18]  Despoina Xanthopoulou,et al.  Working in the sky: a diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. , 2008, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[19]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[20]  David J. Kavanagh,et al.  Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities , 1985, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[21]  C. Maslach,et al.  The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It , 1997 .

[22]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[23]  S. Hobfoll,et al.  Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  CONCEPTS AND STRUCTURES OF EMOTIONS , 2014 .

[25]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. , 2012, Journal of affective disorders.

[26]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  A diary study on the happy worker: How job resources relate to positive emotions and personal resources , 2012 .

[27]  Geert Kelchtermans Vulnerability in Teaching: The Moral and Political Roots of a Structural Condition , 2011 .

[28]  Neil Stewart,et al.  Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait , 2008 .

[29]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? , 2006 .

[30]  P. Schutz,et al.  Introduction to Advances in Teacher Emotion Research: The Impact on Teachers’ Lives , 2009 .

[31]  Michaela Gläser-Zikuda,et al.  Emotional Aspects of Learning and Teaching: Reviewing the Field- Discussing the Issues , 2018 .

[32]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[33]  B. Fredrickson What Good Are Positive Emotions? , 1998, Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association.

[34]  Michaela Gläser-Zikuda,et al.  Emotional Aspects of Learning and Teaching: monothematic issueof Orbis Scholae , 2013 .

[35]  A. Bakker,et al.  Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. , 2006 .

[36]  Wilmar B Schaufeli,et al.  Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement , 2012 .

[37]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  Emotional Stability, Core Self-Evaluations, and Job Outcomes: A Review of the Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research , 2004, Human Performance.

[38]  A. Bakker,et al.  Flow at Work: Evidence for an Upward Spiral of Personal and Organizational Resources* , 2006 .

[39]  A. Bakker,et al.  The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife , 2010 .

[40]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. , 2001 .

[41]  A. Bakker,et al.  Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology , 2008, Bioscience trends.

[42]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries , 2005 .

[43]  F. Chen Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[44]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. , 1999 .

[45]  R. Pekrun The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice , 2006 .

[46]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ) , 2004 .

[47]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure , 1998 .

[48]  A. Bakker,et al.  "Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model": Erratum. , 2007 .

[49]  B. Byrne Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument , 2001 .

[50]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  Antecedents of workplace emotional labor dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms , 2000 .

[51]  Rosemary E. Sutton,et al.  Teachers' Emotions and Teaching: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research , 2003 .

[52]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[53]  Anne C. Frenzel,et al.  Measuring emotions in students learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AE , 2011 .

[54]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  Perceived Teacher Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Job Stress and Burnout: Mediation Analyses , 2008 .

[55]  Michal Biron,et al.  Job burnout and depression: unraveling their temporal relationship and considering the role of physical activity. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Mei-Lin Chang,et al.  An Appraisal Perspective of Teacher Burnout: Examining the Emotional Work of Teachers , 2009 .

[57]  Arnold B. Bakker,et al.  Towards a model of work engagement , 2008 .

[58]  M. Jerusalem,et al.  Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. , 1992 .

[59]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  The emotional practice of teaching , 1998 .

[60]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Maakt arbeid gezond? Op zoek naar de bevlogen werknemer. , 2001 .

[61]  William A. Kahn Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[62]  Izhar Oplatka Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Teaching: The Consequences for Teachers, Pupils, and the School. , 2009 .

[63]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. , 2010, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[64]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. , 2009 .

[65]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[66]  S. T. Innstrand,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relationship between work engagement and symptoms of anxiety and depression. , 2012, Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.

[67]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .