Reversing How to Think about Ambiguous Figure Reversals: Spontaneous Alternating by Uninformed Observers

Ambiguous figures are a special class of images that can give rise to multiple interpretations. Traditionally, switching between the possible interpretations of an ambiguous figure, or reversing one's interpretation, has been attributed either to top-down or to bottom-up processes (eg attributed to having knowledge of the nature of the ambiguity, or to a form of neuronal fatigue). Here we present evidence that is incompatible with both forms of explanations. Observers aged 5–9 years can reverse ambiguous figures when uninformed about the ambiguity, negating purely top-down explanations. Further, those children who make these ‘spontaneous’ reversals are more likely to succeed on a high-order theory-of-mind task, negating purely bottom-up explanations.

[1]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  M Taylor,et al.  Conceptual perspective taking: children's ability to distinguish what they know from what they see. , 1988, Child development.

[3]  I Rock,et al.  Further Evidence of Failure of Reversal of Ambiguous Figures by Uninformed Subjects , 1992, Perception.

[4]  T. Toppino,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes in the Perception of Reversible Figures: Toward a Hybrid Model , 2005 .

[5]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Multiple Representations of the Same Reversible Figure: Implications for Cognitive Decisional Interpretations , 1981, Perception.

[6]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Ambiguous figure perception and theory of mind understanding in children with autistic spectrum disorders , 2005 .

[7]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures , 1977 .

[8]  I Rock,et al.  Why do ambiguous figures reverse? , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[9]  H. Wimmer,et al.  “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children ☆ , 1985 .

[10]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. , 1988, Child development.

[11]  A. Gopnik How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations. , 2001 .

[13]  I Rock,et al.  Do Young Children Reverse Ambiguous Figures? , 1994, Perception.