Targeting error simulator for image-guided prostate needle placement

Motivation: Needle-based biopsy and local therapy of prostate cancer depend multimodal imaging for both target planning and needle guidance. The clinical process involves selection of target locations in a pre-operative image volume and registering these to an intra-operative volume. Registration inaccuracies inevitably lead to targeting error, a major clinical concern. The analysis of targeting error requires a large number of images with known ground truth, which has been infeasible even for the largest research centers. Methods: We propose to generate realistic prostate imaging data in a controllable way, with known ground truth, by simulation of prostate size, shape, motion and deformation typically encountered in prostatic needle placement. This data is then used to evaluate a given registration algorithm, by testing its ability to reproduce ground truth contours, motions and deformations. The method builds on statistical shape atlas to generate large number of realistic prostate shapes and finite element modeling to generate high-fidelity deformations, while segmentation error is simulated by warping the ground truth data in specific prostate regions. Expected target registration error (TRE) is computed as a vector field. Results: The simulator was configured to evaluate the TRE when using a surface-based rigid registration algorithm in a typical prostate biopsy targeting scenario. Simulator parameters, such as segmentation error and deformation, were determined by measurements in clinical images. Turnaround time for the full simulation of one test case was below 3 minutes. The simulator is customizable for testing, comparing, optimizing segmentation and registration methods and is independent of the imaging modalities used.

[1]  Abbas Samani,et al.  Detecting Mechanical Abnormalities in Prostate Tissue Using FE-Based Image Registration , 2007, MICCAI.

[2]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  3D simulation of needle-tissue interaction with application to prostate brachytherapy , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[3]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Accuracy validation for MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Development of multiorgan finite element-based prostate deformation model enabling registration of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[7]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[8]  Ming C. Lin,et al.  Physically-Based Validation of Deformable Medical Image Registration , 2008, MICCAI.

[9]  K J Macura,et al.  The importance of organ geometry and boundary constraints for planning of medical interventions. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Assessment of registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound images of prostates , 2010, Medical Imaging.