Searching for an optimal level of prefabrication in construction: An analytical framework

Abstract Many countries or regions, in recent years, show a rising interest in prefabrication as a “cleaner” production strategy to meet their enormous construction demand, e.g. for housing and infrastructure. Along with this trend is the observation that many governments tend to set forth a high level of prefabrication as a part of their ambitious construction plan. This paper argues that unnecessarily a higher level of prefabrication is better and develops an analytical framework for questing the optimal level of prefabrication adoption in a certain PEST (political, economic, social and technological) background. This framework contains thirteen PEST factors affecting the prefabrication adoption, including policy, supply, labor, social attitude, user acceptance, and so on. These factors in combination will determine the optimal prefabrication adoption level from 0 to 4, which was defined by Gibb 2001 to represent the range from entire cast-in-situ construction to complete prefabricated building, respectively. The framework was substantiated by using Hong Kong's prominent offshore prefabrication construction as a case. It was identified that Levels 2 and 3 are the optimal level of prefabrication adoption subject to the current PEST background in Hong Kong. This paper helps to clarify the prevailing misconception that “the higher the prefabrication level, the better”. The developed framework can be used by other economies to devise their proper prefabrication roadmaps.

[1]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Establishing and weighting decision criteria for building system selection in housing construction , 2012 .

[2]  Irtishad Ahmad,et al.  An Investigation of Critical Factors and Constraints for Selecting Modular Construction over Conventional Stick-Built Technique , 2013 .

[3]  Mustafa Alshawi,et al.  BARRIERS TO INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM ( IBS ) : THE CASE OF MALAYSIA , 2012 .

[4]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: A quantitative perspective , 2016 .

[5]  R. Müller,et al.  On the nature of the project as a temporary organization , 2003 .

[6]  R. Reed,et al.  Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: an investigation of current practice , 2014 .

[7]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Life cycle design and prefabrication in buildings: A review and case studies in Hong Kong , 2014 .

[8]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers , 2003 .

[9]  Carl T. Haas,et al.  Considering prework on industrial projects , 2005 .

[10]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Modeling and Forecasting Construction Labor Demand: Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[11]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  Investigating waste reduction potential in the upstream processes of offshore prefabrication construction , 2013 .

[12]  Dong Zhai,et al.  Relationship between Changes in Material Technology and Construction Productivity , 2009 .

[13]  Chao Mao,et al.  Risk factors affecting practitioners’ attitudes toward the implementation of an industrialized building system: A case study from China , 2015 .

[14]  Marcus Bjelkemyr,et al.  Design for construction: utilizing production experiences in development , 2013 .

[15]  Bengt Hansson,et al.  ASSESSING THE DEGREE OF INDUSTRIALISATION IN CONSTRUCTION - A CASE OF UGANDA , 2006 .

[16]  W Lu.  Enhancing housing production in Hong Kong through BIMatizing offshore prefabrication , 2013 .

[17]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[18]  Ehsan Gharaie,et al.  Examining the Drivers and States of Organizational Change for Greater Use of Prefabrication in Construction Projects , 2017 .

[19]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model , 2016 .

[20]  Guiwen Liu,et al.  Business Model Innovation and Its Drivers in the Chinese Construction Industry during the Shift to Modular Prefabrication , 2017 .

[21]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction , 2007 .

[22]  Deborah J. Fisher,et al.  NEUROMODEX - NEURAL NETWORK SYSTEM FOR MODULAR CONSTRUCTION DECISION MAKING , 1994 .

[23]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Constraints to the Use of Off-site Production on Construction Projects , 2005 .

[24]  Louise Bildsten,et al.  Exploring the opportunities and barriers of using prefabricated house components , 2011 .

[25]  Chao Mao,et al.  A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China’s new urbanisation , 2018 .

[26]  Wendy Miller,et al.  Predicting Australian builders’ intentions to use prefabrication , 2014 .

[27]  M. Motiar Rahman,et al.  Barriers of Implementing Modern Methods of Construction , 2014 .

[28]  David R. Riley,et al.  Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings , 2010 .

[29]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Best practice of prefabrication implementation in the Hong Kong public and private sectors , 2015 .

[30]  Rene M. Bakker,et al.  Temporary Organizing: Promises, Processes, Problems , 2016 .

[31]  E. Chan,et al.  Prefabrication and barriers to entry—a case study of public housing and institutional buildings in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[32]  Jalan Pahang,et al.  BARRIERS TO INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM (IBS): THE CASE OF MALAYSIA , 2009 .

[33]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Schedule risk modeling in prefabrication housing production , 2017 .