Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis

Abstract Objectives To determine the prevalence of false or misleading statements in messages posted by internet cancer support groups and whether these statements were identified as false or misleading and corrected by other participants in subsequent postings. Design Analysis of content of postings. Setting Internet cancer support group Breast Cancer Mailing List. Main outcome measures Number of false or misleading statements posted from 1 January to 23 April 2005 and whether these were identified and corrected by participants in subsequent postings. Results 10 of 4600 postings (0.22%) were found to be false or misleading. Of these, seven were identified as false or misleading by other participants and corrected within an average of four hours and 33 minutes (maximum, nine hours and nine minutes). Conclusions Most posted information on breast cancer was accurate. Most false or misleading statements were rapidly corrected by participants in subsequent postings.

[1]  A. Feenberg,et al.  The online patient meeting , 1996, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[2]  Tom Ferguson,et al.  Health Online: How To Find Health Information, Support Groups, And Self Help Communities In Cyberspace , 1996 .

[3]  M. Hedegaard,et al.  The relationship between psychological distress during pregnancy and birth weight for gestational age , 1996, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  N. Weinberg,et al.  Online help: cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group. , 1996, Health & social work.

[5]  F Gerr,et al.  Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. , 1997, Journal of general internal medicine.

[6]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web , 1999, AMIA.

[8]  J. Biermann,et al.  Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet , 1999, Cancer.

[9]  John E. Lester,et al.  Information exchange in an epilepsy forum on the World Wide Web , 1999, Seizure.

[10]  M. Morse,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology - 36th Annual Meeting. , 2000, IDrugs : the investigational drugs journal.

[11]  T. Kaptchuk,et al.  Perceptions about Complementary Therapies Relative to Conventional Therapies among Adults Who Use Both: Results from a National Survey , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  M. Kramer,et al.  How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth? , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  K Mursch,et al.  Internet-based interaction among brain tumour patients. Analysis of a medical mailing list. , 2003, Zentralblatt fur Neurochirurgie.

[14]  J. Till,et al.  Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: importance of the navigator role , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[15]  K. Mccaul,et al.  Information Gathering Over Time by Breast Cancer Patients , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  C. Hobel,et al.  Maternal Prenatal Anxiety and Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Associated With Timing of Delivery , 2004, Psychosomatic medicine.

[17]  J. Whittaker,et al.  Are reported preterm birth rates reliable? An analysis of interhospital differences in the calculation of the weeks of gestation at delivery and preterm birth rate , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  Howard Frumkin,et al.  Medical information on the internet , 1997, Journal of General Internal Medicine.