Explaining Environmental Sustainability in Supply Chains Using Graph Theory

The need for theory building in environmental supply chains has been at the centre of many discussions in recent years. Existing research, however, does not typically consider methods that aim at theory generation. Current methods such as econometric modelling or structural equation modelling face challenges related to how causality is established due to potential issues regarding cross-sectional data sets. To address this gap, this paper suggests a total interpretive structural modelling based approach. We use graph theory logic to synthesize expert interpretations in the form of a theoretical supply chain model. This method may prove to be an alternative method to econometric based modelling or structural equation modelling. We provide an application of the method in exploring the drivers of low carbon supply chain and their relationships. Limitations and future research opportunities are also provided.

[1]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Binary Matrices in System Modeling , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  S. Koh,et al.  NATURAL RESOURCE BASED GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2012 .

[3]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Toward greener supply chains: is there a role for the new ISO 50001 approach to energy and carbon management? , 2016, Energy Efficiency.

[4]  Roger L. Burritt,et al.  Critical environmental concerns in wine production: an integrative review , 2013 .

[5]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Introduction and Survey of Group Decision Making with Applications to Worth Assessment , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  Malin Song,et al.  Will environmental logistics be promoted by changing industrial structure? A quantitative analysis from 1978 to 2007 in China , 2012 .

[7]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[8]  A. Haleem,et al.  Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry , 2014 .

[9]  Ravi Kant,et al.  Modelling the SCM enablers: an integrated ISM‐fuzzy MICMAC approach , 2013 .

[10]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain , 2013 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[12]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Generating Research Questions Through Problematization , 2011 .

[13]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation , 2013, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[14]  M. Song,et al.  Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation , 2016 .

[15]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[16]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Developing Subsystem Matrices in Structural Modeling , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  Zeynep Akşin,et al.  The Modern Call Center: A Multi‐Disciplinary Perspective on Operations Management Research , 2007 .

[18]  Jane Lu Hsu,et al.  Carbon reduction knowledge and environmental consciousness in Taiwan , 2015 .

[19]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[20]  Lotfi Belkhir,et al.  Does GRI reporting impact environmental sustainability? A cross-industry analysis of CO2 emissions performance between GRI-reporting and non-reporting companies , 2017 .

[21]  Neetu Yadav Total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of strategic performance management for Indian telecom service providers , 2014 .

[22]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Green supply chain management enablers: Mixed methods research , 2015 .

[23]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Social Network Analysis For Organizations , 1979 .

[25]  A. Joshi,et al.  Corporate Ecological Responsiveness: Antecedent Effects of Institutional Pressure and Top Management Commitment and Their Impact on Organizational Performance , 2013 .

[26]  G. Hult,et al.  Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains , 2007 .

[27]  D. Power,et al.  Building Bridges : Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[28]  K. Weick What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[29]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Identification of Flexible Manufacturing System Dimensions and Their Interrelationship Using Total Interpretive Structural Modelling and Fuzzy MICMAC Analysis , 2014 .

[30]  V. Guide,et al.  Notes from the Editors: Restructuring the Journal of Operations Management , 2015 .

[31]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling , 2015 .

[32]  J. Wacker A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management , 1998 .

[33]  Yanlong Zhang,et al.  Partially and Wholly Overlapping Networks: The Evolutionary Dynamics of Social Dilemmas on Social Networks , 2015 .

[34]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-Enabled Business Transformation , 2011, MIS Q..

[35]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Empirical Elephants—Why Multiple Methods are Essential to Quality Research in Operations and Supply Chain Management , 2008 .

[36]  P. Deutz,et al.  Using game theory to describe strategy selection for environmental risk and carbon emissions reduction in the green supply chain , 2012 .

[37]  Göran Svensson,et al.  Implementing and managing economic, social and environmental efforts of business sustainability: propositions for measurement and structural models , 2015 .

[38]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain , 2010 .

[39]  Lakshman S. Thakur,et al.  Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[41]  G. Kovács,et al.  The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency , 2010 .

[42]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[43]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability , 2010, MIS Q..

[44]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[45]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OPERATIONAL PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE AMONG EARLY ADOPTERS OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES , 2004 .

[46]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India , 2008 .

[47]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[48]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Building Theory of Green Supply Chain Management using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM) , 2015 .

[49]  Martin Müller,et al.  Drivers, Practices and Outcomes of Low-carbon Operations: Approaches of German Automotive Suppliers to Cutting Carbon Emissions , 2015 .

[50]  Marco Melacini,et al.  Benchmarking supply chain sustainability: insights from a field study , 2011 .

[51]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: Insights from Uppsala , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Yahaya Yusuf,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) Systems , 2012 .

[53]  K. Lai,et al.  An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature , 2011 .

[54]  T. Foxon,et al.  The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition , 2013 .

[55]  Ma Ga Yang,et al.  Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[56]  E. Plambeck Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management , 2012 .

[57]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Fuzzy-TISM: A Fuzzy Extension of TISM for Group Decision Making , 2014, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[58]  N. Oreskes,et al.  Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming , 2016 .

[59]  S. Golicic,et al.  Searching for competitive advantage through sustainability , 2009 .

[60]  Ma-Lin Song,et al.  Analysis of Carbon Emissions and Their Influence Factors Based on Data from Anhui of China , 2015 .

[61]  C. Carter,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions , 2011 .

[62]  Sushil How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? , 2016, Annals of Operations Research.

[63]  Ali H. Diabat,et al.  A carbon-capped supply chain network problem , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[64]  Akhilesh Barve,et al.  Modeling Post-disaster Challenges of Humanitarian Supply Chains: A TISM Approach , 2016 .

[65]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[66]  Yongqiang Liu,et al.  Contributions of open crop straw burning emissions to PM2.5 concentrations in China , 2016 .

[67]  M Balaji,et al.  Modeling the causes of food wastage in Indian perishable food supply chain , 2016 .

[68]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment , 1975 .

[69]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions , 2017 .

[70]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[72]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[73]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[74]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[75]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[76]  S. Benoit,et al.  Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior , 2014 .

[77]  Fabian J. Sting,et al.  Managing R&D Project Shifts in High‐Tech Organizations: A Multi‐Method Study , 2016 .

[78]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: evidence from the automotive sector , 2016 .

[79]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[80]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Eco-innovations in more sustainable supply chains for a low-carbon economy: a multiple case study of human critical success factors in Brazilian leading companies , 2015 .

[81]  Jie Wu,et al.  Advances in energy and environmental issues in China: theory, models, and applications , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[82]  F. Smarandache,et al.  ELEMENTARY FUZZY MATRIX THEORY AND FUZZY MODELS FOR SOCIAL SCIENTISTS , 2007, math/0702144.

[83]  C. Blome,et al.  Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier , 2016 .

[84]  Ning Zhang,et al.  On Modeling Environmental Production Characteristics: A Slacks-Based Measure for China’s Poyang Lake Ecological Economics Zone , 2015 .

[85]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Toward greater integration of insights from organization theory and supply chain management , 2007 .

[86]  R. Rajagopalan,et al.  Design of cellular production systems A graph-theoretic approach , 1975 .

[87]  H. Walker,et al.  Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors , 2008 .