The Effect of Fluid Shear Stress on Endothelial Cell Adhesiveness to Polymer Surfaces with Wettability Gradient.

In this study, the adhesive strength of endothelial cells (ECs) attached on polymer surfaces with different hydrophilicity was investigated using wettability gradient polyethylene (PE) surfaces prepared by corona discharge treatment from a knife-type electrode whose power increases gradually along the sample length. The EC-attached wettability gradient surfaces were mounted on parallel-plate flow chambers in a flow system prepared for cell adhesiveness test. Three different shear stresses (150, 200, and 250 dyne/cm(2)) were applied to the flow chambers and each shear stress was maintained for 120 min to investigate the effect of shear stress and surface hydrophilicity on the EC adhesion strength. It was observed that the ECs were adhered more onto the positions with moderate hydrophilicity of the wettability gradient surface than onto the more hydrophobic or hydrophilic positions. The maximum adhesion of the cells appeared at around water contact angles of 55 degrees. The EC adhesion strength was higher on the hydrophilic positions than on the hydrophobic ones. However, the maximum adhesion strength of the cells also appeared at around water contact angles of 55 degrees. More than 90% of the adhered cells remained on that position after applying the shear stress, 250 dyne/cm(2) for 2 h, whereas the cells were completely detached on the hydrophobic position (water contact angle, about 86 degrees ) within 10 min after applying the same shear stress. It seems that surface hydrophilicity plays a very important role for cell adhesion strength. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

[1]  Ingemar Lundström,et al.  A wettability gradient method for studies of macromolecular interactions at the liquid/solid interface , 1987 .

[2]  D. K. Owens Mechanism of corona–induced self-adhesion of polyethylene film , 1975 .

[3]  Y Ikada,et al.  Fibroblast growth on polymer surfaces and biosynthesis of collagen. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  J. Feijen,et al.  Adhesion of cultured human endothelial cells onto methacrylate polymers with varying surface wettability and charge. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[5]  B. Dalton,et al.  Adsorption of fibronectin and vitronectin onto Primaria and tissue culture polystyrene and relationship to the mechanism of initial attachment of human vein endothelial cells and BHK-21 fibroblasts. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[6]  H. Busscher,et al.  Growth of fibroblasts and endothelial cells on wettability gradient surfaces , 1997 .

[7]  A. Callow,et al.  Increased in-vitro incubation time of endothelial cells on fibronectin-treated ePTFE increases cell retention in blood flow. , 1991, European journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Adhesion and spreading of human skin fibroblasts on physicochemically characterized gradient surfaces. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  J. F. Carley,et al.  Corona-discharge treatment of polymeric films, II: Chemical studies , 1980 .

[10]  G. Truskey,et al.  Effect of the conformation and orientation of adsorbed fibronectin on endothelial cell spreading and the strength of adhesion. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  J. Feijen,et al.  Interaction of cultured human endothelial cells with polymeric surfaces of different wettabilities. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[12]  N Nakabayashi,et al.  The effect of the chemical structure of the phospholipid polymer on fibronectin adsorption and fibroblast adhesion on the gradient phospholipid surface. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[13]  M. Helmus,et al.  Enhanced strength of endothelial attachment on polyester elastomer and polytetrafluoroethylene graft surfaces with fibronectin substrate. , 1986, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  B D Ratner,et al.  Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  Yoshito Ikada,et al.  Effect of preadsorbed proteins on cell adhesion to polymer surfaces , 1993 .

[16]  Mu Shik Jhon,et al.  Characterization of wettability gradient surfaces prepared by corona discharge treatment , 1992 .

[17]  H C van der Mei,et al.  Influence of substratum wettability on the strength of adhesion of human fibroblasts. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[18]  G. Truskey,et al.  Effect of fibronectin amount and conformation on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion to HEMA/EMA copolymers. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  Y. Ikada,et al.  GRAFT COPOLYMERIZATION OF ACRYLAMIDE ONTO A POLYETHYLENE SURFACE PRETREATED WITH GLOW DISCHARGE , 1986 .

[20]  H. Busscher,et al.  The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  H. Lee,et al.  Interaction of Different Types of Cells on Polymer Surfaces with Wettability Gradient. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[22]  B. Tighe,et al.  Cellular interactions with synthetic polymer surfaces in culture. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[23]  J. Feijen,et al.  Adsorption of fibronectin derived from serum and from human endothelial cells onto tissue culture polystyrene. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  R. Marchant,et al.  Human endothelial cell growth and coagulant function varies with respect to interfacial properties of polymeric substrates. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  P. Tengvall,et al.  Fibroblast adhesion onto methyl-silica gradients with and without preadsorbed protein. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  Donald L. Wise,et al.  Encyclopedic Handbook of Biomaterials and Bioengineering , 1995 .

[27]  G. Truskey,et al.  The effect of fluid shear stress upon cell adhesion to fibronectin-treated surfaces. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  H. Greisler,et al.  Polypropylene small-diameter vascular grafts. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibronectin adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces detected by antibody binding and analyzed during cell adhesion in serum-containing medium. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[30]  A. Baszkin,et al.  Physico-chemical modifications of superficial regions of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film under corona discharge , 1984 .

[31]  B. Ratner,et al.  Hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers as cell substrates: Effect on 3T3 cell growth rates , 1985 .

[32]  J. H. Lee,et al.  A wettability gradient as a tool to study protein adsorption and cell adhesion on polymer surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[33]  C. Zarins,et al.  Carotid Bifurcation Atherosclerosis: Quantitative Correlation of Plaque Localization with Flow Velocity Profiles and Wall Shear Stress , 1983, Circulation research.

[34]  F. A. Bennett,et al.  A comparison of the biological activities of the cell-adhesive proteins vitronectin and fibronectin. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[35]  D. Briggs,et al.  Surface modification of polyethylene by electrical discharge treatment and the mechanism of autoadhesion , 1978 .

[36]  J H Lee,et al.  Interaction of fibroblasts on polycarbonate membrane surfaces with different micropore sizes and hydrophilicity. , 1999, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[37]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Development and use of a parallel-plate flow chamber for studying cellular adhesion to solid surfaces. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.