Modelling photosynthetic efficiency (α) for the light-response curve of cocksfoot leaves grown under temperate field conditions

Abstract Net photosynthetic rate was measured from the youngest fully expanded leaves of field grown cocksfoot ( Dactylis glomerata L.) in open pastures and under trees in the Lincoln University silvopastoral experiment (New Zealand). The photosynthetic efficiency ( α ) and convexity ( θ ) of the light-response curve were derived from 209 fitted non-rectangular hyperbola functions. There was no relationship between θ and any of the environmental or management variables with a stable mean value of 0.96. For α , individual functions were required for temperature (10–31 °C), nitrogen (N) concentration (1.5–5.9% N), water status (expressed as pre-dawn leaf water potential, ψ lp ) (−0.01 to −1.6 MPa), regrowth duration (20–60 days), and different times (up to 180 min) under moderate (850–950 μmol m −2  s −1 photon irradiance) and severe (85–95 μmol m −2  s −1 photon irradiance) shade. The highest α of 0.036 μmol CO 2 /μmol photon irradiance was found in non-limiting conditions and defined as the standardised maximum ( α s =1). Values of α s =1 were measured in optimum ranges of 10–24 °C, 4.0–5.9% N, −0.01 to −1.0 MPa and 20 days regrowth. In addition, values of α s reached a steady-state asymptote of 0.74 after 60 min of severe shade and 0.92 after 40 min of moderate shade. Individual functions of α could not be integrated into a simple multiplicative model but a ‘law of the minimum factor’ model was appropriate. Predicted results from this model were then validated with 46 independent data points collected when at least two factors were outside their optimum range. The model accounted for 88% of the variation in observed α values. This research has derived functional relationships for α that can be used to assist predictions of leaf photosynthesis and ultimately pasture growth by their inclusion in canopy photosynthesis models.

[1]  P. Peri Leaf and canopy photosynthesis models for cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) grown in a silvopastoral system , 2002 .

[2]  Susan J. Riha,et al.  Modelling daily net canopy photosynthesis and its adaptation to irradiance and atmospheric CO2 concentration , 1996 .

[3]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[4]  J. Sheehy Microclimate, Canopy Structure and Photosynthesis in Canopies of Three Contrasting Temperate Forage Grasses: III. Canopy Photosynthesis, Individual Leaf Photosynthesis and the Distribution of Current Assimilate , 1977 .

[5]  J. Thornley Grassland Dynamics: An Ecosystem Simulation Model , 1998 .

[6]  D. Moot,et al.  Modelling net photosynthetic rate of field‐grown cocksfoot leaves to account for regrowth duration , 2003 .

[7]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO2, and O2 Concentration , 1977 .

[8]  J. Raven,et al.  Growth of Chara Hispida: II. Shade Adaptation , 1984 .

[9]  K. Treharne,et al.  Effect of temperature on photosynthetic activity of climatic races of Dactylis glomerata L. , 1970 .

[10]  B. Marshall,et al.  A Model for C3 Leaves Describing the Dependence of Net Photosynthesis on Irradiance , 1980 .

[11]  M. Duru,et al.  Growth and Senescence of the Successive Leaves on a Cocksfoot Tiller. Effect of Nitrogen and Cutting Regime , 2000 .

[12]  H. Keulen,et al.  Simulation of Water Use, Nitrogen Nutrition and Growth of a Spring Wheat Crop , 1987, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[13]  John R. Porter,et al.  A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations , 1984, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[14]  Tadaki Hirose,et al.  Nitrogen use efficiency in instantaneous and daily photosynthesis of leaves in the canopy of a Solidago altissima stand , 1987 .

[15]  C. A. Black,et al.  Soil Fertility Evaluation and Control , 1993 .

[16]  N. Baker Photosynthesis and the Environment , 1996, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration.

[17]  Leaf Photosynthetic Activity in Six Temperate Grass Varieties Grown in Contrasting Light and Temperature Environments , 1974 .

[18]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Water stress in field-grown perennial ryegrass. 1. Its effect on growth, canopy photosynthesis and transpiration. , 1980 .

[19]  G. Edwards,et al.  Oxygen inhibition of photosynthesis , 2004, Planta.

[20]  D. Moot,et al.  Net photosynthetic rate of cocksfoot leaves under continuous and fluctuating shade conditions in the field , 2002 .

[21]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Variation in Quantum Yield for CO(2) Uptake among C(3) and C(4) Plants. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[22]  M. Werger,et al.  Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy , 1987, Oecologia.

[23]  K. Cameron,et al.  Lysimeter study of the fate of nitrogen in animal urine returns to irrigated pasture , 1994 .

[24]  G. F. Sassenrath-Cole,et al.  Photosynthesis in Fluctuating Light Environments , 1996 .

[25]  D. Moot,et al.  An integrated model for predicting maximum net photosynthetic rate of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) leaves in silvopastoral systems , 2003, Agroforestry Systems.

[26]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis. , 1967 .

[27]  The effect of nitrogenous fertilizer on the photosynthesis of leaves of a ryegrass sward , 1985 .

[28]  D. Moot,et al.  Modelling net photosynthetic rate of field-grown cocksfoot leaves under different nitrogen, water and temperature regimes , 2002 .

[29]  J. Sheehy,et al.  Canopy Photosynthesis and Crop Growth Rate of Eight Temperate Forage Grasses , 1975 .

[30]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[31]  D. Grindlay REVIEW Towards an explanation of crop nitrogen demand based on the optimization of leaf nitrogen per unit leaf area , 1997, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[32]  A. J. Walker,et al.  Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield , 1989 .