A dynamic model of herbivore–plant interactions on grasslands

Abstract A model of plant and large herbivore dynamics is presented in which individual animal intake is limited by either diet digestibility (DIG) or forage availability and in which grazing can result in sward heterogeneity. The model is used to illustrate the interaction between animal density, plant dynamics, sward heterogeneity and diet selection strategy and how this subsequently feeds back to affect animal intake and sward heterogeneity. Two contrasting diet selection strategies were simulated; selection for maximum instantaneous intake of mass (IR) and selection for DIG. For both diet selection strategies, individual animal intake initially increased with increasing animal density, as intake was limited by DIG and the greater frequency of defoliation maintained the sward in a more juvenile and digestible state. As animal density increased further, a point was reached at which intake became limited by forage availability and individual animal intake fell thereafter. The DIG strategy resulted in a higher daily intake than the IR strategy when grazing pressure was low. Here, intake was limited by digestibility and the DIG strategy led by repeated defoliation, to the maintenance of a small proportion of the sward in a state of high digestibility. The model was further used to show that selection for a strategy of long-term optimisation of sward structure through modulation of bite depth is unlikely. The model highlights the potential plasticity of the grazing process and the need to include plant dynamics in models of large herbivore–plant interactions.

[1]  I. Gordon,et al.  Prediction of intake and digestion in ruminants by a model of rumen kinetics integrating animal size and plant characteristics , 1991, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[2]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Forage Quality and Aggregation by Large Herbivores , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[3]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  The Scaling of Intake Rate in Mammalian Herbivores , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Newman,et al.  A Mechanistic Model of Some Physical Determinants of Intake Rate and Diet Selection in a Two-Species Temperate Grassland Sward , 1994 .

[5]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  The effect of functional response on stability of a grazer population on a landscape , 1997 .

[6]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Vegetative crop growth model incorporating leaf area expansion and senescence, and applied to grass , 1983 .

[7]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Mechanisms of Foraging in Mammalian Herbivores: New Models of Functional Response , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[8]  S. Woodward.  Bite mechanics of cattle and sheep grazing grass-dominant swards , 1998 .

[9]  M. Demment,et al.  Bite Dimensions and Herbage Intake by Cattle Grazing Short Hand‐Constructed Swards , 1991 .

[10]  N. Hutchings.  A model of a grass sward continuously grazed to a constant mean height , 1991 .

[11]  P. Jarman,et al.  The Social Organisation of Antelope in Relation To Their Ecology , 1974 .

[12]  Michael B. Coughenour,et al.  Invited Synthesis Paper: Spatial Components of Plant-Herbivore Interactions in Pastoral, Ranching, and Native Ungulate Ecosystems , 1991 .

[13]  John Stanley Bircham,et al.  Herbage growth and utilisation under continuous stocking management , 1981 .

[14]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti , 1985 .

[15]  J. Hodgson.  The control of herbage intake in the grazing ruminant , 1985, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[16]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  The stability of grazing systems revisited: spatial models and the role of heterogeneity , 1999 .

[17]  John E. Gross,et al.  Functional Response of Herbivores in Food‐Concentrated Patches: Tests of a Mechanistic Model , 1993 .

[18]  E. Laca,et al.  Effects of sward height and bulk density on bite dimensions of cattle grazing homogeneous swards , 1992 .

[19]  N. Hutchings,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and other sources of variance in sward height as measured by the sonic and HFRO sward sticks , 1991 .

[20]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Grazing Lawns: Animals in Herds, Plant Form, and Coevolution , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[21]  L. Torvell,et al.  Growth rate, senescence and photosynthesis of ryegrass swards cut to maintain a range of values for leaf area index , 1984 .

[22]  I. Gordon,et al.  Costs and benefits of foraging on grasses varying in canopy structure and resistance to defoliation , 1995 .

[23]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Sward canopy structure and the bite dimensions and bite weight of grazing sheep , 1991 .

[24]  I. Gordon,et al.  Sources of variation in the foraging efficiency of grazing ruminants , 1996 .

[25]  Iain J. Gordon,et al.  Could mammalian herbivores "manage" their resources? , 1990 .

[26]  M. Ridout,et al.  Application of double normal frequency distributions fitted to measurements of sward height , 1988 .

[27]  E. Ungar,et al.  HERBAGE INTAKE IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY AND SWARD STRUCTURE: GRAZING PROCESSES AND OPTIMAL FORAGING , 1988 .

[28]  J. Newman,et al.  A note on the behavioural strategies used by grazing animals to alter their intake rates , 1994 .

[29]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments , 1993 .