Targeting Your Preferences: Modelling Micro-Targeting for an Increasingly Diverse Electorate

: The use of data to inform and run political campaigning has become an inescapable trend in recent years. In attempting to persuade an electorate, micro-targeted campaigns (MTCs) have been employed to great effect throughthe useof tailoredmessaging andselective targeting. Herewe investigatethe capacityof MTCs to dealwiththediversityofpoliticalpreferencesacrossanelectorate. Moreprecisely,viaanAgent-BasedModelwe simulate various diverse electorates that encompass single issue, multiple issue, swing, and disengaged voters (among others, including combinations thereof) and determine the relative persuasive efficacy of MTCs when pitted against more traditional, population-targeting campaigns. Taking into account the perceived credibility of these campaigns, we find MTCs highly capable of handling greater voter complexity than shown in previous work, and yielding further advantages beyond traditional campaigns in their capacity to avoid inefficient (or even backfiring) interactions – even when fielding a low credibility candidate.

[1]  Matteo G. Richiardi,et al.  Estimation of ergodic agent-based models by simulated minimum distance , 2015 .

[2]  J. Block,et al.  Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later , 2006 .

[3]  D. Green,et al.  Get Out the Vote!: How to Increase Voter Turnout , 2004 .

[4]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Simulating political attitudes and voting behavior , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[5]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[6]  Jens Koed Madsen,et al.  Repeated discrete choices in geographical agent based models with an application to fisheries , 2019, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Francisco José León Medina,et al.  Endogenous Changes in Public Opinion Dynamics , 2019, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  Raymond R. Hill,et al.  A Survey of Agent-Based Modeling Practices (January 1998 to July 2008) , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations , 2011 .

[10]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[11]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences , 2015, Psychological science.

[12]  Christoph Niemann,et al.  Optimal Opinion Control: The Campaign Problem , 2014, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[13]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Travis N. Ridout,et al.  Television vs. YouTube: political advertising in the 2012 presidential election , 2018 .

[15]  John Sides,et al.  The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns , 2014 .

[16]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  Simply Complexity: A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory , 2007 .

[18]  Toby D. Pilditch,et al.  A method for evaluating cognitively informed micro-targeted campaign strategies: An agent-based model proof of principle , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  Ethan Porter,et al.  The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence , 2019 .

[20]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[21]  Greg J. Stephens,et al.  Bias, Belief and Consensus: Collective opinion formation on fluctuating networks , 2015, Physical review. E.

[22]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence From Candidate Use of Twitter During the 2015 and 2017 U.K. Elections , 2017, Communication Research.

[23]  Teppei Yamamoto,et al.  Measuring Voters’ Multidimensional Policy Preferences with Conjoint Analysis: Application to Japan’s 2014 Election , 2017, Political Analysis.

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion , 1984 .

[25]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment , 2014 .

[26]  Heather L. LaMarre,et al.  Facebook Politics: Toward a Process Model for Achieving Political Source Credibility Through Social Media , 2014 .

[27]  M. Levi,et al.  Political Trust and Trustworthiness , 2000 .

[28]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  C. Sibley,et al.  Personality and political orientation: Meta‐analysis and test of a threat‐constraint model. , 2012 .

[30]  Stefania Bandini,et al.  Agent Based Modeling and Simulation: An Informatics Perspective , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[31]  S. Hartmann.  Bayesian Epistemology , 2005 .

[32]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[33]  Muaz A. Niazi,et al.  Agent-based tools for modeling and simulation of self-organization in peer-to-peer, ad hoc, and other complex networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[34]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Jens Koed Madsen,et al.  Trump supported it?! A Bayesian source credibility model applied to appeals to specific American presidential candidates' opinions , 2016, CogSci.

[36]  M. Lodge,et al.  The Rationalizing Voter , 2013 .

[37]  Chris Dorsett,et al.  A computational approach to managing coupled human–environmental systems: the POSEIDON model of ocean fisheries , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[38]  Seth Stephens-Davidowitz,et al.  Everybody lies : what the Internet can tell us about who we really are , 2018 .

[39]  Porismita Borah,et al.  Political Facebook use: Campaign strategies used in 2008 and 2012 presidential elections , 2016 .

[40]  e-traces,et al.  The great British Brexit robbery : how our democracy was hijacked | Technology | The Guardian - e-traces , 2017 .

[41]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Agent-Based Models , 2014, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[42]  Linda M. Seiter,et al.  Catch Me if You Can: Using a Threshold Model to Simulate Support for Presidential Candidates in the Invisible Primary , 2020, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[43]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[44]  J. Madsen.  The Psychology of Micro-Targeted Election Campaigns , 2019 .

[45]  Jan C. Thiele.  R Marries NetLogo: Introduction to the RNetLogo Package , 2014 .

[46]  Adam J. L. Harris,et al.  Argument Content and Argument Source: An Exploration , 2009 .