How electrode montage affects transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex

Several different electrode configurations were originally proposed to induce excitability changes in the hand area of the motor cortex in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). However only one was found to efficiently affect cortical excitability: anode/cathode over the primary motor cortex and return electrode placed over the contralateral orbit (M-CF configuration). In this work we used the finite element method to calculate the electric field (E-field) induced in a realistic human head model in all the proposed electrode configurations. In order to analyze the results, average values of the E-field's magnitude and polar/azimuthal angles were calculated in several cortical motor and premotor areas which may have an effect on the output of the primary motor cortex. The average E-field's magnitude at the hand-knob (HK) was similar between the M-CF configuration (0.16 V/m) and a few other tested configurations, the same happening for the average polar angle (129°). However this configuration achieved the highest mean E-field values over premotor (PM) areas (0.21 V/m). These results show that the polar angle and the average magnitude of the E-field evaluated at the HK and at the PM cortex might be important parameters in predicting the success of a specific electrode montage in tDCS.

[1]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  B. Roth Mechanisms for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue. , 1994, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[5]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[7]  RP Dum,et al.  The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  P. Strick,et al.  Supplementary Motor Area and Presupplementary Motor Area: Targets of Basal Ganglia and Cerebellar Output , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  H. Topka,et al.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.