Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions.

Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a promising noninvasive examination for colorectal cancer screening; however, the optimal interpretation strategy remains undecided. Virtual dissection is an innovative technique whereby the three-dimensional (3D) model of the colon is virtually unrolled, sliced open, and displayed as a flat 3D rendering of the mucosal surface, similar to a gross pathologic specimen. This technique has the potential to reduce evaluation time by providing a more rapid 3D image assessment than is possible with an antegrade and retrograde 3D endoluminal fly-through. It may also ultimately improve accuracy by reducing blind spots present with 3D endoluminal displays and by reducing reader fatigue. A disadvantage of virtual dissection is the potential for distortion of colonic lesions and normal anatomy. To avoid potential pitfalls in image interpretation, the radiologist must be familiar with the unique appearance of the normal colon anatomy and of various pathologic findings when using virtual dissection with two-dimensional axial and 3D endoluminal CT colonographic image data sets.

[1]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Feasibility of Planar Virtual Pathology: A New Paradigm in Volume-Rendered CT Colonography , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Jorge A Soto,et al.  Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  E G McFarland,et al.  Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  J. Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography using 360° virtual dissection : A feasibility study , 2006 .

[5]  D S Paik,et al.  Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  CT colonography using different reconstruction modi. , 2005, Clinical imaging.

[7]  M. Macari,et al.  Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  P. Macmathuna,et al.  Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only , 2004, European Radiology.

[10]  G Wang,et al.  Straightening the colon with curved cross sections: an approach to CT colonography. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[11]  Ge Wang,et al.  GI tract unraveling with curved cross sections , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Jorge A Soto,et al.  Automated volumetry at CT colonography: a phantom study. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[13]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  CT colonography with intravenous contrast material: varied appearances of colorectal carcinoma. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  H. Hoppe,et al.  Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Macari,et al.  Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  K R Hoffmann,et al.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Frits H. Post,et al.  Chapter r Three-dimensionall Display Modes for CT Colonography : : Conventional 3 D Virtual Colonoscopyy versus Unfolded Cube Projection , 2007 .

[18]  G Wang,et al.  Distortion reduction for fast soft straightening of the colon. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[19]  G Wang,et al.  Fast algorithm for soft straightening of the colon. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[20]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[22]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. , 2000, Radiology.