Adapting haptic guidance authority based on user grip

Haptic guidance systems support the operator in task execution using additional forces on the input device. Scaling of the guidance forces determines the control authority of the support system. As task complexity may vary, one level of the guidance scaling may be insufficient, and adaptation of the control authority may be helpful. The available literature mostly proposed to adapt the authority based on external cues (e.g. actual performance or safety) and the user had no direct way to modulate the desired level of support. In this paper we investigated a variable authority guidance scheme based on the user grip force. During a user study (with 8 subjects) we explored two opposite approaches to trade the control authority (i.e. increasing or decreasing guidance force magnitude with increased user grip). To simulate increased task difficulty and imperfections of the haptic guidance system, at random times either an unpredictable force disturbance was added or subjects were presented with incorrect guidance. While the performance differences between the fixed- and the variable-authority schemes were not significant, the “decreasing guidance with increased user grip” scheme allowed to substantially reduce the user control effort (steering force), especially when the guidance system was incorrect. The presented method essentially provides additional control over the guidance system without reducing the performance.

[1]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  User-controlled variable impedance teleoperation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Recognition of operator motions for real-time assistance using virtual fixtures , 2003, 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003. HAPTICS 2003. Proceedings..

[3]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Characteristics of Human-Machine Cooperative Manipulation Using Virtual Fixtures With Variable Admittance , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[4]  René van Paassen,et al.  Reducing steering wheel stiffness is beneficial in supporting evasive maneuvers , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[5]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Balancing safety and support: Changing lanes with a haptic lane-keeping support system , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[6]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Effect of virtual fixture compliance on human-machine cooperative manipulation , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[8]  Martin Buss,et al.  Enhancing task classification in human-machine collaborative teleoperation systems by real-time evaluation of an agreement criterion , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[9]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Exploring the Dimensions of Haptic Feedback Support in Manual Control , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Frank Flemisch,et al.  Automation spectrum, inner / outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation , 2008 .

[11]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Is grip strength related to neuromuscular admittance during steering wheel control? , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Angelika Peer,et al.  Exploring the Design Space of Haptic Assistants: The Assistance Policy Module , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[13]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Neuromuscular Analysis as a Guideline in designing Shared Control , 2010 .

[14]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  René van Paassen,et al.  Neuromuscular analysis based tuning of haptic shared control assistance for UAV collision avoidance , 2013, 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC).

[16]  L. Bainbridge Ironies of Automation , 1982 .

[17]  David A. Abbink,et al.  Task Instruction: the largest Influence on Human Operator Motion Control Dynamics , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[18]  René van Paassen,et al.  Haptic interface in UAV tele-operation using force-stiffness feedback , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[19]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Adaptive Virtual Fixtures for Machine-Assisted Teleoperation Tasks , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.